Andrew Gough wrote:
I can tell you that I have signed an NDA and have been presented with more information than Duncan has revealed here. Impressive.
Do treat Duncan's considerably detailed work with the respect I know you would want others to extend to your research.
Also, Duncan will be speaking at the next Rennes Group, which will be announced later this week. I hope you can make it.
Can you explain something for me.
I am wondering why Duncan Burden has been given special consideration to present an article as he has.
As you have confirmed, there is much more material behind what has already been disclosed.
What is the point of leaving his "revelations" at the point it was left?
Why disclose you have signed an NDA and that more detailed information has been granted to you?
Is this the first of a series of "revelations" or will it be left as it is.
Of itself, I can't see that the Key revealed is anything new. This is a well known ancient symbol.
So why bother?
Why dangle these things before us? This is no different than Roger, Tingra, Sheila and Renne et al dangling daily the Crista before us.
I have been around these sorts of discussion groups for many years and I have seen many people "reveal" things which are piecemeal and pretend to be the keepers of a deeper truth.
I believe that anyone that actually knows the Truth has no need to say they know the Truth. On this basis alone I would question the motives of anyone that promotes themselves as the keeper of the Truth.
One of the great admonitions of the initiates is TACERE.
Don't you think you owe us an explanation?