Arcadia Discussion Zone

Forums dedicated to history's mysteries, Rennes-le-Château and beyond…

Read the Arcadia Forum House Rules

It is currently 24 May 2013 1:45 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 25 Jul 2010 8:36 am 
Offline
Researcher

Joined: 15 Jul 2010 11:16 pm
Posts: 7
Hello every one
I came across this on you tube : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0P10nW-Kjc
Well, it's rather enlightning.

Je suis tombée sur ceci sur you tube, c'est plutôt édifiant.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Douzet's company: "Maps and Models"
PostPosted: 28 Jul 2010 9:06 am 
Offline
Adept
User avatar

Joined: 18 Jun 2008 6:32 pm
Posts: 58
Location: Perpignan
Well done Maât...

This video doesn't match with the answering of Question 3 by Andrew :

Quote:
3. Why after all this time (12+ years) have you not published the evidence linking the Model with Saunière? Would that not hush the constant drone of skepticism?

Indeed. In the beginning, people doubted me as they “knew” I made “Models”. But this was when I was young, and they were Model airplanes, with a little motor. So they accused me of fabricating the Model and my reputation as a “Model maker” stuck.

Source: http://www.andrewgough.co.uk/17questions_andre.html

It seems that Douzet has forgotten to inform Andrew that he was in charge of a company specialized in "Maps and Models" in the 80's.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Douzet's company: "Maps and Models"
PostPosted: 28 Jul 2010 2:41 pm 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 8920
Location: Los Angeles
Pascal wrote:
Well done Maât...

This video doesn't match with the answering of Question 3 by Andrew :

Quote:
3. Why after all this time (12+ years) have you not published the evidence linking the Model with Saunière? Would that not hush the constant drone of skepticism?

Indeed. In the beginning, people doubted me as they “knew” I made “Models”. But this was when I was young, and they were Model airplanes, with a little motor. So they accused me of fabricating the Model and my reputation as a “Model maker” stuck.

Source: http://www.andrewgough.co.uk/17questions_andre.html

It seems that Douzet has forgotten to inform Andrew that he was in charge of a company specialized in "Maps and Models" in the 80's.


Coppens let it slip a decade ago that Douzet's maquettte was one of Monsignor Enrico Galbiati's archaeological models. Given Galbiati's penchant for mixing with some of the more far-fetched faux-chivalric orders of recent vintage (specifically those proffered by the late Don Roberto Paternò to bolster his strange claim to the soi-disant Crown of Aragon) where his path crossed with the likes of Forest Barber and John Driscoll, I put more weight on Coppens' gaffe to explain the source of the artifact. If Douzet had fabricated this piece himself, I highly doubt that its interpretation as a geological reverse-map of Périllos would be quite so strained and cryptic. He'd have made it something much more straightforward.

TCP


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 28 Jul 2010 9:27 pm 
Offline
Researcher

Joined: 15 Jul 2010 11:16 pm
Posts: 7
Hello TCP.

Well seen about Filip. But when we see what he reveals on the English society Perillos, we are sure about one point. AD lied to Filip his friend who had all is esteem and fraternity (as says AD) for years without any scrupules. So what knows Filip or not. Well he knows for sure a lot of lies. As everyone indeed.

We can speculate on this point: made it or not the “maquette”. Why even if he didn’t make it does he lie? I guess because he has no evidence about what he claims. If he said he is a “maquettiste”, he has to show evidence. People would be distrustful. And he wins on another point. Malicious people are being horrid with him trying to say lie against him (so attacked all the time), and so he makes you laugh and he gains all your sympathy and you complain with him and don’t go further. So, not enough to lie he manipulate people? Well I don’t care if the maquette is true or fake, in the 2 answers it’s not very beautiful.

But the point is not if he made or not the “maquette”. The point is he lies, and it appears all the time on everything and to anyone. When we see on the others evidences made clearly not evidence at all, or the changes of scene he has to do.

When someone lies so easily to friends, to people who pay to listen (or at least come) to him, what can we trust in his sayings? And worse, we have to trust him only on his sayings… Funny in fact...

Personally I’m not ready… And less and less...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 28 Jul 2010 9:47 pm 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 8920
Location: Los Angeles
Maât wrote:
Hello TCP.

Well seen about Filip. But when we see what he reveals on the English society Perillos, we are sure about one point. AD lied to Filip his friend who had all is esteem and fraternity (as says AD) for years without any scrupules. So what knows Filip or not. Well he knows for sure a lot of lies. As everyone indeed.

We can speculate on this point: made it or not the “maquette”. Why even if he didn’t make it does he lie? I guess because he has no evidence about what he claims. If he said he is a “maquettiste”, he has to show evidence. People would be distrustful. And he wins on another point. Malicious people are being horrid with him trying to say lie against him (so attacked all the time), and so he makes you laugh and he gains all your sympathy and you complain with him and don’t go further. So, not enough to lie he manipulate people? Well I don’t care if the maquette is true or fake, in the 2 answers it’s not very beautiful.

But the point is not if he made or not the “maquette”. The point is he lies, and it appears all the time on everything and to anyone. When we see on the others evidences made clearly not evidence at all, or the changes of scene he has to do.

When someone lies so easily to friends, to people who pay to listen (or at least come) to him, what can we trust in his sayings? And worse, we have to trust him only on his sayings… Funny in fact...

Personally I’m not ready… And less and less...


Coppens gets no sympathy from me; based on my own direct experience with both men I concluded long ago that neither one is more or less deceitful than the other. They are driven by their own ambitions and have led countless people astray for years. Douzet has become a toxic embarrassment to Coppens and is no longer useful to him. If there was the slightest possibility that he could wring another sou out of Société Perillos, Coppens would be there trying to collect it. Fortunately for him, he now has a rich girlfriend.

TCP


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 11 Aug 2010 3:41 pm 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 9245
Location: France
ah...i was waiting for someone to post that up.....looks like polysterene to me...well hoovered of course.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 12 Aug 2010 3:14 am 
Offline
Grand Master
User avatar

Joined: 19 Apr 2008 8:59 am
Posts: 1371
Location: Various
The only question, as ever, remains "Why?" :(

_________________
Ingeniosis apertum, Stolidisque sigillatum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 12 Aug 2010 6:23 am 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 8920
Location: Los Angeles
Roger wrote:
Not only is it polystyrene, but it's the very "bouchon" later photographed as the entrance to the "2nd tomb". You can see it in an early stage of its creation, right in the top photographs.

But the amazing part is that this will in no way open the eyes of the "faithful" to the true nature of their "guru"... The sect will carry on.


Why won't they go back to Arginy where they belong?

TCP


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 12 Aug 2010 6:24 am 
Offline
Grand Master
User avatar

Joined: 19 Apr 2008 8:59 am
Posts: 1371
Location: Various
Oh la la!

_________________
Ingeniosis apertum, Stolidisque sigillatum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 12 Aug 2010 2:36 pm 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 8920
Location: Los Angeles
Roger wrote:
I believe you'll find that the local Gendarmerie has strict orders regarding trespassers of the "guru" persuasion at Arginy.

What's puzzling is that the amount of deceit and energy poured into the SP could have so easily been better employed in producing real elements of historical interest. It's worse than sad and a waste, it's STOOOOPID.


I think Messrs. Douzet and Coppens are more interested in "guaranteed" results...

TCP


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 13 Aug 2010 3:51 pm 
Offline
High King
User avatar

Joined: 04 Dec 2008 7:15 pm
Posts: 2047
Location: Vienna, Austria
Roger wrote:
Not only is it polystyrene, but it's the very "bouchon" later photographed as the entrance to the "2nd tomb". You can see it in an early stage of its creation, right in the top photographs.

But the amazing part is that this will in no way open the eyes of the "faithful" to the true nature of their "guru"... The sect will carry on.

At least it opened YOUR eyes some time ago. :lol:

Regards

CaglioStraw


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 13 Aug 2010 3:53 pm 
Offline
High King
User avatar

Joined: 04 Dec 2008 7:15 pm
Posts: 2047
Location: Vienna, Austria
TCP wrote:
I think Messrs. Douzet and Coppens are more interested in "guaranteed" results...

We're just sitting and watching these wheels go by. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 14 Aug 2010 8:26 am 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 9245
Location: France
http://societe-perillos.forumdediscussi ... 57.htm#853

.....our maquettiste is blowing a fuse over on the SP forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 14 Aug 2010 9:05 am 
Offline
Grand Master
User avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2008 1:29 pm
Posts: 1235
Location: England
Sheila wrote:
.....our maquettiste is blowing a fuse over on the SP forum.

They're an excitable lot aren't they. And Monsieur André is certainly not a happy bunny!

VAM


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 14 Aug 2010 4:08 pm 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 8920
Location: Los Angeles
Roger wrote:
Ever since Mr. Coppens' investiture as "Prince of The Bloodline", I believe he has determined that any association with the likes of the SP is not compatible with his new status.


I'm sure he was not personally responsible for making that determination. :lol:

TCP


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 14 Aug 2010 4:11 pm 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 8920
Location: Los Angeles
VeryAngryMother wrote:
Sheila wrote:
.....our maquettiste is blowing a fuse over on the SP forum.

They're an excitable lot aren't they. And Monsieur André is certainly not a happy bunny!


Pity... :mrgreen:

TCP


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 14 Aug 2010 9:44 pm 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 9245
Location: France
...it might not be that.... i don't think it's really correct to comment on the personal aspect.

I wish them all the best...if they are happy, then that's great...and IF André wants to bow out gracefully, disgracefully, or otherwise, then he should be allowed to do so. Admittedly i don't know the full depth of this sorry saga, except what has become evident to me over the past three and a half years, but whatever...one should turn the other cheek.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 14 Aug 2010 9:49 pm 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 8920
Location: Los Angeles
Roger wrote:
I feel very bad for his new dupe, that poor Belgian woman.
I do hope both she and her wallet escape intact from the experience.


What happened to his Polish mistress? Did she finally wise up?

TCP


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 14 Aug 2010 11:33 pm 
Offline
Researcher

Joined: 15 Jul 2010 11:16 pm
Posts: 7
We don't have to talk about their private life. It's their own business.
The point is her answer is very strange. Not a single word about the SP's research who appears to be in great difficulties. She just talk about her private life as she particularly feels she's being got at by someone. I read and again and I can't figure out where she took this feeling. I guess reading «décors », courtade, testament, etc... she would have had others important things to answer!
It looks like she is just answering on what he said to her. Attacks on private life or side effects not on the lack of evidence or false one. Like to the people who answer then. It's clear as she recognize it herself.
And of course it's the worst of all, if this were the case.
Does he respect someone? Someone who helps him?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 15 Aug 2010 7:42 pm 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 8920
Location: Los Angeles
Roger wrote:
Quote:
Ramondo de Perillos y roccafull fut le 64e grand maître de l'ordre des Hospitaliers de Saint-Jean de Jérusalem, plus connu sous le nom d'ordre de Malte. Pour mémoire, au moment des faits, nous sommes à la fin du XVIIe siècle quand il exerce son poste de manière exemplaire et quasiment unique dans l'histoire de l'ordre.

A l'origine, il ne s'agit pas d'un descendant de sang, ou par alliance, des familles de Périllos. Dans le 'CASAS 25L' (ALD d'Espagne), il est montré qu'en réalité on peut couper le nom en deux car ce Raimondo est originaire de la famille des Roccafull et acquiert, moyennant deniers, le nom de Périllos qu'il ajoute légalement à son nom avec sans doute le titre nobiliaire qui va avec...

Nous noterons que l'achat d'un titre ou d'un nom est alors possible (encore aujourd'hui en Espagne) sous réserve que la famille soit éteinte. Il faut donc supposer que les Périllos ne sont plus de ce monde alors que nous les pensions partis en Espagne suite au rattachement du Roussillon à la couronne de France. Est-ce bien ce qu'il s'est passé où y a t-il autre chose ?


Still getting it ALL wrong! After first claiming that this fellow waqs the lord of Perillos, and that he was buried there (secretly, according to them), they now claim he "bought the title"!

Well... maybe five more years will do it and they'll finally get it right? Somehow, I doubt it.


Oh, lordie... who packed this baloney into its very thin skin?

The disposition of the viscounty of Périllos is well documented and not at all hard to follow. It passed to a daughter, Francina, married to a man called Pere de Toreillas. They had two daughters, Aldoncina and Agraïda. Aldoncina married a man named Guillaume de Carmain; Agraïda married a man called Giner de Rabasa. Two branches established: Carmain-Périllos and Rabasa-Périllos, later spelled Perellos. The former held the property from the early 1470s until about 1491, when Guillaume de Carmain ran afoul of Ferdinand of Aragon. It was confiscated and given to Giner de Rabasa. Raymond de Perellos Roccafull (or Roquefeuil) was the direct descendant of Giner and Agraïda, in fact his older brother, who held the title Vizconde de Perellos was named Giner. That line went extinct in 1852.

This is not rocket science and I cannot believe for a moment that Douzet is so inept that he can't read. This is deliberate obfuscation on his part designed to create a "real" claim for some of his former neighbors in Durban - people who are descended from a French branch of the Toreillas family styled "Treilles" or "Treilhes" named Gléon de Durban, one of whom in the 1700s styled himself Vicomte de Périllos although he never got approval for it. Joseph de Gléon de Durban was a Toreillas descendant and a Carmain descendant but not a descendant of Guillaume de Carmain and Aldoncine de Toreillas; he was also the uncle by marriage of a Carmain heiress from another branch entirely, married to a Bruyères-Chalabre. He died childless and none of his relatives ever picked up his non-existent claim to a title he had no legal right to bear.

This is getting beyond ridiculous.

TCP


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 15 Aug 2010 8:41 pm 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 9245
Location: France
....and he's pulled the polysterene pics.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 15 Aug 2010 9:05 pm 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 8920
Location: Los Angeles
Sheila wrote:
....and he's pulled the polysterene pics.


I'll wait for the dull thud... should be coming any time now.

TCP


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 15 Aug 2010 9:10 pm 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2007 1:57 pm
Posts: 9245
Location: France
:D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 16 Aug 2010 2:09 am 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 8920
Location: Los Angeles
Roger wrote:
It's foolish to try to predict what fools will do, but I'll attempt it anyway.
I think that the guru will scuttle the SP as soon as his arrangements with his mysterious new financial backers are in place. His exposure as a "maquettiste" will simply be a convenient excuse for the tantrum. These backers, I'll bet, are of the Trans-Atlantic persuasion.

So the saga will continue... :wink:


Care to throw out a few names?

TCP


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Un maquettiste oui
PostPosted: 06 Sep 2010 10:19 pm 
Offline
High King

Joined: 26 Oct 2006 9:11 pm
Posts: 2771
Location: Livingston, Scotland.
Sheila wrote:
....and he's pulled the polysterene pics.


Polysterene models...the Crystal Skulls farce. No end to the man's talents ! :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 34 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group