Ben Hammott's Confession on Radio

Spartacus Paraclete · **Joined:** 30 Dec 2009 12:04 pm **Posts:** 1906

scorpieauxgirl wrote:

.....anybody else hear Boz Scaggs playing in the background????
Look our for that dirty lowdown yall..........
youtube link-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQK_QAUa8Dw

Baby's into runnin' around
Hanging with the crowd
Putting your business in the street talking out loud
Saying you found this tomb or that
And how much you done spent
I swear Ben must believe it's all heaven sent
Hey boy, you better bring the Mummy-chick around
To the sad, sad truth, the dirty lowdown

(Whooooo, I wonder, wonder, wonder, wonder who)
Taught her how to lie like that
(Whooooo, I wonder, wonder, wonder, wonder who)
Gave Ben that big idea

Nothing you can't handle, nothing you ain't got
Put the mummy on the table (rose marble slab) and drive it off the lot
Turn on that ole lovelight and turn a maybe to a yes
Same old schoolboy game got you into this mess
Hey son, better get on back to town
Face the sad old truth, the dirty lowdown

(Whooooo, I wonder, wonder, wonder, wonder who)
Put those ideas in your head
(Whooooo, I wonder, wonder, wonder, wonder who)

Come on back down earth, son
Dig the low, low, low, low lowdown

You ain't got to be so bad got to be so cold
This dog eat dog existence sure is getting old
Got to have a Jones for this Jones for that
This running with the Joneses boy
Just ain't where it's at
You gonna come back around
To the sad, sad truth, the dirty lowdown

(Whooooo, I wonder, wonder, wonder, wonder who)
Got you thinking like that boy
(Whooooo, I wonder, wonder, wonder, wonder who)

(I wonder, wonder, wonder, wonder who)
(Say whooooo, I wonder, wonder, wonder, wonder who)
Ooooooh look out for that lowdown
That dirty, dirty, dirty, dirty lowdown
(Whoooo I wonder, wonder, wonder, wonder who, ohh, ohh)
Got you thinking like that

:wink:

edited to change a few words in the lyrics..........no harm intended really
Just being silly and I thought it was funny. No haters please. :wink:

DRAC · **Joined:** 01 Apr 2012 5:43 pm **Posts:** 28

Renne wrote:

I think that the clash between DRAC and Icremote is very real. I really enjoyed

their exchanges and I miss them. I hope that I did not scare them away by revealing my

great age.

Fear not, old lady, DRAC is still monitoring this forum and collecting evidence. We are busy investigating Ben Hammott's claim to have found a tomb.

Currently we are concerned with the role that Ben Hammott's brother plays in this story. You see, Michael Hammott was present when the tomb was found. But why would Ben Hammott add his brother into the story if this was a hoax? How could he then claim that he was solely responsible for the hoax? If it was made up, why not come up with a story that could not be contradicted by a (supposed) witness? Again the question must be asked, why is Ben Hammott lying about this hoax?

French intelligence and police services have been unable to find anyone by the name Michael Hammott. Any help in this matter would be greatly appreciated.

As for Icremote, perhaps Poussin's pointing shepherds have sent Icremote off to do mischief elsewhere. Since France is not an option, maybe there is some other landscape pentagram (Bornholm?) that needs digging up. Just dig wherever the shepherds point, Icremote! Ha Ha Ha!

scorpieauxgirl · **Posted:** 24 Apr 2012 6:52 pm

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

BULLDOGNIC · **Joined:** 24 Apr 2008 2:43 pm **Posts:** 1873

scorpieauxgirl wrote:

Wilkinson, not Hammot, right?

True
Regards
Nic
Edit to add:- How would you know what information the French Secret Service have DRAC ?

rain · **Posted:** 24 Apr 2012 11:02 pm

scorpieauxgirl wrote:

Wilkinson, not Hammot, right?

Quite right.

Renne · **Posted:** 25 Apr 2012 1:23 am

"Lampe Rosaire in the church of Rennes-le-Château destroyed...."

Does anyone know the story behind this beautiful lamp?

DRAC, I think you underestimate the intuitive detective work done by the Tombman. The

team wonders why you have not read the book and tried to find the cave from the church clues

before this time. The location is apparently a closely held secret. What archaeologist has ever been

allowed to keep his finds?

DRAC · **Joined:** 01 Apr 2012 5:43 pm **Posts:** 28

Renne wrote:

The team wonders why you have not read the book and tried to find the cave from the church clues
before this time.

The team? Are you a spokesperson for Team Hammott?

Renne wrote:

What archaeologist has ever been allowed to keep his finds?

Is this a rhetorical question? We have noticed that you ask questions and contribute with comments that are either non-sequiturs or are just too subtle. Either way, your posts are largely ignored by the keener intellects of this forum. Have you noticed that?

DRAC · **Joined:** 01 Apr 2012 5:43 pm **Posts:** 28

BULLDOGNIC wrote:

How would you know what information the French Secret Service have DRAC ?

Of course, we do not know exactly what information they have. But we can make enquiries through our contacts. For instance, we have found out that Sandy Hamblett has become a person of interest for her role in this strange story. It seems that she implicated herself by displaying knowledge of the contents of one of Ben Hammott's bottles before said bottle was opened. Our contacts doubt Ben Hammott's ability to have produced these documents and now think that Sandy Hamblett may be responsible.

Davinho · **Joined:** 26 Jan 2010 10:58 am **Posts:** 1809

I wouldn't put too much hope in them considering they don't realise Hammott is not a real surname :lol:

rain · **Posted:** 26 Apr 2012 11:35 am

Davinho wrote:

I wouldn't put too much hope in them considering they don't realise Hammott is not a real surname :lol:

Who's this "we", DRAC - are they the other voices that inhabit the same head? How's that search for "Michael Hammott" coming along has anyone offered any information yet?

Renne · **Posted:** 27 Apr 2012 12:23 am

So then, are you the spokesperson for DRAC? What is the conflict? Archaeologists

cannot keep the treasures that they find, did Ben want to claim the contents of the cave?

Good luck figuring out the clues in the church, you overestimate your ability to replicate Ben`s

discoveries. I am in a different time zone and cannot contribute to on-going conversations. There

is a larger audience to this forum and I write for them.

"Both Lord Carnarvon and Mr. James said the Highclere objects came to Britain legitimately under agreements that called for a 50-50 division of recovered artifacts between the Egyptian Government and the Carnarvon-Carter team.

But today Egpytian officials asserted that no such arrangement existed, and the Minister of Culture, Farouk Hosni, has instructed the Egyptian Ambassador in London to seek return of the materials.

Lord Carnarvon said he would meet the Egyptian Ambassador, Yousef Sharara, on Thursday to discuss the matter, and he professed puzzlement at the Egyptian position."

Was there a problem similar to this dispute over ownership of the cave contents? "Keener intellects" - that`s funny.

Renne · **Posted:** 27 Apr 2012 12:42 am

"There had been questions about their provenance when the artifacts were acquired by the Met at various times from the 1920s through 1940s because even so close to Howard Carter’s 1922 discovery, the thousands of artifacts found in the tomb weren’t thoroughly documented. At that time the practice of partage — where the excavator was allowed to keep a portion of the artifacts found — was common, but as the decade it took Carter’s team to recover the enormous treasure wore on, the Egyptian government passed specific legislation to ensure that everything found in Tut’s tomb would remain property of Egypt. They even made Carter sign a waiver to that effect.

By an extraordinary coincidence, high quality artifacts from around King Tutankhamun’s time seemed to be turning up a lot in various collections in the ’20s and ’30s. Then when Carter died in 1939, his estate was found to be replete with just those sorts of objects. Lord Carnarvon’s was too."

VeryAngryMother · **Posted:** 27 Apr 2012 7:51 am

Renne wrote:

did Ben want to claim the contents of the cave? Good luck figuring out the clues in the church, you overestimate your ability to replicate Ben`s discoveries. I am in a different time zone and cannot contribute to on-going conversations. There is a larger audience to this forum and I write for them. Was there a problem similar to this dispute over ownership of the cave contents?

Renne did you miss the bit about Hammott making all this up?

VAM

rain · **Posted:** 27 Apr 2012 9:25 am

VeryAngryMother wrote:

Renne wrote:

did Ben want to claim the contents of the cave? Good luck figuring out the clues in the church, you overestimate your ability to replicate Ben`s discoveries. I am in a different time zone and cannot contribute to on-going conversations. There is a larger audience to this forum and I write for them. Was there a problem similar to this dispute over ownership of the cave contents?

Renne did you miss the bit about Hammott making all this up?

VAM

Na, she just missed the quasi-intelligent, nonsensical piece of unremorseful claptrap that we were fed and expected to swallow. Good for her.

VeryAngryMother · **Posted:** 27 Apr 2012 10:11 am

rain wrote:

Na, she just missed the quasi-intelligent, nonsensical piece of unremorseful claptrap that we were fed and expected to swallow. Good for her.

So what do you believe is the truth?

VAM

Spartacus Paraclete · **Joined:** 30 Dec 2009 12:04 pm **Posts:** 1906

VeryAngryMother wrote:

rain wrote:

Na, she just missed the quasi-intelligent, nonsensical piece of unremorseful claptrap that we were fed and expected to swallow. Good for her.

So what do you believe is the truth?

VAM

lcremote will be pleased that his 'confession-hoax theory' is gathering momentum :lol:

btw...

I was recently walking in a forest in the English midlands. I had my video-recorder in my hand, when suddenly I tripped. By some mad twist of faith my recorder fell down a hole in the forest floor. I had to use my former skills as a boy scout to fish it back out, using only bootlaces, a bag of jellies and some ants. I then continued on my walk. However, much to my surprise, I eventually discovered that during the fall, my recorder had switched itself on (must have hit the button) and filmed what was down the hole! I can clearly make out a pair of bright green tights, and a pointed hat with a feather. There also seems to be what looks like a long bow, and a hood. Does anybody have any idea what it is I might have discovered?

VeryAngryMother · **Posted:** 27 Apr 2012 10:35 am

Spartacus Paraclete wrote:

lcremote will be pleased that his 'confession-hoax theory' is gathering momentum

Weirdos!

VAM

Spartacus Paraclete · **Joined:** 30 Dec 2009 12:04 pm **Posts:** 1906

VeryAngryMother wrote:

Spartacus Paraclete wrote:

lcremote will be pleased that his 'confession-hoax theory' is gathering momentum

Weirdos!

VAM

BULLDOGNIC · **Joined:** 24 Apr 2008 2:43 pm **Posts:** 1873

Spartacus Paraclete wrote:

VeryAngryMother wrote:

rain wrote:

Na, she just missed the quasi-intelligent, nonsensical piece of unremorseful claptrap that we were fed and expected to swallow. Good for her.

So what do you believe is the truth?

VAM

lcremote will be pleased that his 'confession-hoax theory' is gathering momentum :lol:

btw...

I was recently walking in a forest in the English midlands. I had my video-recorder in my hand, when suddenly I tripped. By some mad twist of faith my recorder fell down a hole in the forest floor. I had to use my former skills as a boy scout to fish it back out, using only bootlaces, a bag of jellies and some ants. I then continued on my walk. However, much to my surprise, I eventually discovered that during the fall, my recorder had switched itself on (must have hit the button) and filmed what was down the hole! I can clearly make out a pair of bright green tights, and a pointed hat with a feather. There also seems to be what looks like a long bow, and a hood. Does anybody have any idea what it is I might have discovered?

Erm was it Piltdown Man :wink:

Regards
Nic

rain · **Posted:** 27 Apr 2012 11:53 am

Spartacus Paraclete wrote:

VeryAngryMother wrote:

rain wrote:

Na, she just missed the quasi-intelligent, nonsensical piece of unremorseful claptrap that we were fed and expected to swallow. Good for her.

So what do you believe is the truth?

VAM

lcremote will be pleased that his 'confession-hoax theory' is gathering momentum :lol:

btw...

I was recently walking in a forest in the English midlands. I had my video-recorder in my hand, when suddenly I tripped. By some mad twist of faith my recorder fell down a hole in the forest floor. I had to use my former skills as a boy scout to fish it back out, using only bootlaces, a bag of jellies and some ants. I then continued on my walk. However, much to my surprise, I eventually discovered that during the fall, my recorder had switched itself on (must have hit the button) and filmed what was down the hole! I can clearly make out a pair of bright green tights, and a pointed hat with a feather. There also seems to be what looks like a long bow, and a hood. Does anybody have any idea what it is I might have discovered?

or is it

IMHO I think it starts with Robin and ends with Hood. But what I really want to know is where are the Merry men?

tingra · **Posted:** 27 Apr 2012 12:11 pm

Could have been a PIXIE, here is an idea for Wilkinson, how to create a pixie from start to finish, after all Roscoe does keep banging on about how the people in the Aude would rather believe in the pixies and fairies :lol:

……

……….http://www.fuzzyfolk.co.uk/

rain · **Posted:** 27 Apr 2012 12:21 pm

VeryAngryMother wrote:

rain wrote:

Na, she just missed the quasi-intelligent, nonsensical piece of unremorseful claptrap that we were fed and expected to swallow. Good for her.

So what do you believe is the truth?

VAM

No bloody idea, VAM.

What about you, VAM? What's the truth according to you?

rain · **Posted:** 27 Apr 2012 1:28 pm

tingra wrote:

Could have been a PIXIE, here is an idea for Wilkinson, how to create a pixie from start to finish, after all Roscoe does keep banging on about how the people in the Aude would rather believe in the pixies and fairies :lol:

……

……….http://www.fuzzyfolk.co.uk/

photographic proof of pixies. It's a wrap. I can just imagine Roscoe sitting down to felt a pixie. :lol:

that made my night.

They are soooooooo cute.

Spartacus Paraclete · **Joined:** 30 Dec 2009 12:04 pm **Posts:** 1906

btw, I've also decided that I am descended from Jesus, and that therefore I am very important. I can prove it because my ancestors were Lamberts. Think about it... DagoBERT, SigisBERT, LamBERT. The link is clear. Any treasure found near Rennes-le-Chateau is clearly mine by right of BERT.

Spartacus Paraclete · **Joined:** 30 Dec 2009 12:04 pm **Posts:** 1906

tingra wrote:

Could have been a PIXIE, here is an idea for Wilkinson, how to create a pixie from start to finish, after all Roscoe does keep banging on about how the people in the Aude would rather believe in the pixies and fairies :lol:

……

……….http://www.fuzzyfolk.co.uk/

No way, as I clearly pointed out, there is a FEATHER in a POINTED hat... :roll:

Arcadia Discussion Zone

Ben Hammott's Confession on Radio

Who is online