Coincidence Right?

roscoe · **Joined:** 02 Dec 2006 3:44 pm **Posts:** 6956

Dunkerque - Barcelona (i.e. Paris Meridian) = 666 miles

Skellig Michael to Bourges Cathedral = 666 miles - Angle 66.6 degrees. (That's 90 degrees minus the tilt angle of the earth)

Weighing of souls on the facade of Bourges Cathedral

That's the job of

ST MICHAEL

Distance from Barcelona to Bourges (St Michael crossing point) as a ratio of Barcelona to Dunkerque is 0.618 to 1

i.e. THE GOLDEN SECTION.

But hey! It's ALLLLLLL coincidence. The ancients couldn't possibly have done this, therefore they didn't. Go back to sleep.

Have a nice day.

roscoe · **Joined:** 02 Dec 2006 3:44 pm **Posts:** 6956

Oh and by the way

555 miles

But remember

IT'S ALLLLLL COINCIDENCE

wayward · **Posted:** 09 Mar 2012 9:44 am

roscoe wrote:

But remember

IT'S ALLLLLL COINCIDENCE

Your right Roscoe, the ancients, as we know them, could not have done this, so IYO, who did?

richard.webster · **Posted:** 09 Mar 2012 10:05 am

wayward wrote:

roscoe wrote:

But remember

IT'S ALLLLLL COINCIDENCE

Your right Roscoe, the ancients, as we know them, could not have done this, so IYO, who did?

IMO, Bill, an Antediluvian people who came before the ancients, as we know them.

Well worth a read, some good ideas in here.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Atlantis-Bl ... 234&sr=8-1

Quote:

'The Atlantis Blueprint ends with a question--is there a city beneath the ice of Antarctica? In fact, the book is a mystery-fest, linking a host of popular enigmas to the theory that civilisation is thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of years older than we think. It proposes the existence of an antediluvian world-wide maritime civilisation whose blueprint left a legacy of specially positioned sacred sites around the world and whose centre, Atlantis, may be in Antarctica due to earth crust displacement. If any of this sounds familiar, its because much of it is not new. Indeed this book constantly cites other related literature to support its ideas, bringing in such writers as Graham Hancock, Michael Baigent and Robert Bauval. Rejecting some especially outlandish theories, The Atlantis Blueprint shows a will to speak sensibly and it is easy to agree that conventional science has historically underestimated our earliest ancestors and that archaeology is now pushing back the age of civilisation. Readers would need to be experts in a wide variety of disciplines to assess exactly how much scepticism this book deserves, but many will possess enough general knowledge to debate with parts of it. The Atlantis Blueprint is, whatever else, a thought-provoking assemblage of fringe science theories on some of the worlds most enduring mysteries. And, we remember, some of sciences most brilliant theories were derided in their time.' - Karen Tiley, Amazon.co.uk Review

richard.webster · **Posted:** 09 Mar 2012 10:46 am

Bill - Some further thoughts on the book I mentioned above, that I put up here last year on another thread.

richard.webster on 23rd February 2011 wrote:

The Atlantis Blueprint, Rand Flem-Ath & Colin Wilson, 2000

It was a pleasure to read this book again; I actually enjoyed it more the second time. When I first read this, back in 2003 or 2004, it was the section on Rennes-le-Chateau that drew me to it, and the one which upon reading the book I was most eager to get to, and this may have led me to pay less attention than I should have done to the remainder of the text. Reading the book again, a number of years later, and with my interest in RLC much diminished, it was perhaps possible to take a more balanced and rounded – and less one-eyed – view of the subject matter.

Which isn’t to say that the book doesn’t have its deficiencies. It’s a somewhat clumsily constructed narrative that lacks a clear sense of direction, little attempt is made to draw together the various strands of the book’s arguments into a coherent conclusion, and some of the material appears extraneous to the matter at hand. The RLC section also includes some rather wince-making pronouncements and assumptions, and the account of Sauniere’s life and activities – albeit not terribly relevant to the authors’ thesis – appears to have been lifted directly from the Accursed Treasure / Plantard-ian / HBHG playbook, with little or no account taken of the many errors and canards that have come to light in the succeeding years.

These are the negatives, but there is still an awful lot in this book to find interesting, and to enjoy, and even occasionally to be quite enthralled by.

The book’s subtitle is “Unlocking the Mystery of a Long Lost Civilisation”, and its essential argument is that our civilisation is many thousands of years older than we have thus far been led to believe, and the authors demonstrate this through the analysis of various archaeological discoveries and oddities, but also, and for the most part, by plotting the location of many sacred sites throughout the world, and then factoring in polar shifts and earth crust displacement, in order that their positions might be determined many thousands of years previously, and in so doing the authors find the most extraordinary grid linked by latitudes either present or previous, that can only lead one to assume that a long-ago, and long-lost civilisation had the wherewithal both to traverse the globe, and to plot these navigations accurately, the end result being a worldwide network of sacred sites. One such place is Rennes-le-Chateau and its oft-discussed alignments, and here and elsewhere, due note is made of the importance of units of measure. It’s heady stuff at times, with its musings about the possibility of an antediluvian, maritime civilisation with global reach, that somehow ceased to exist due to some kind of natural catastrophe, but which nevertheless managed to leave the faintest of imprints upon the world, the vestiges of which are only now starting to come to light. The concept of the lost world of Atlantis inevitably enters the equation at this point, and the book presents some interesting ideas about how this ancient civilisation, assuming it existed, might lie buried beneath the ice of Antarctica.

The book also serves as – indeed, at times reads as – an overview of this field of study over the past few decades, from Charles Hapgood’s seminal Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings, through to the work of Erich von Daniken, Robert Bauval and Graham Hancock, and a host of others. The book also, as one would expect, has considerable geographic reach, and takes the reader to some of the most celebrated archaeological sites in the world, as well as some lesser known ones. The book certainly inspires one to find out more about some of these places, so fascinating in their own right, regardless of whether or not one buys into the authors’ overall thesis.

All in all, this is an enjoyable, interesting and at times illuminating and thought provoking book, that I would recommend to anyone with an interest in this sort of subject matter. For the most part, the authors steer a careful and sensible course between science and speculation, and it opens one’s mind to some immensely intriguing possibilities. The book contains an extensive bibliography and several appendices, and taken as a whole, and setting minor quibbles aside, it is, in my view, a very worthwhile book to own, and one that I have pleasure in commending.

Davinho · **Joined:** 26 Jan 2010 10:58 am **Posts:** 1806

on a similar theme, worth a read too

http://www.amazon.com/Opening-Ark-Covenant-Frank-Joseph/dp/156414903X

richard.webster · **Posted:** 09 Mar 2012 11:09 am

Davinho wrote:

on a similar theme, worth a read too

http://www.amazon.com/Opening-Ark-Covenant-Frank-Joseph/dp/156414903X

Yes, that does look rather good. Here's the UK Amazon link.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Opening-Ark-Cov ... 178&sr=8-1

rain · **Posted:** 09 Mar 2012 12:15 pm

richard.webster wrote:

Bill - Some further thoughts on the book I mentioned above, that I put up here last year on another thread.

richard.webster on 23rd February 2011 wrote:

The Atlantis Blueprint, Rand Flem-Ath & Colin Wilson, 2000

It was a pleasure to read this book again; I actually enjoyed it more the second time. When I first read this, back in 2003 or 2004, it was the section on Rennes-le-Chateau that drew me to it, and the one which upon reading the book I was most eager to get to, and this may have led me to pay less attention than I should have done to the remainder of the text. Reading the book again, a number of years later, and with my interest in RLC much diminished, it was perhaps possible to take a more balanced and rounded – and less one-eyed – view of the subject matter.

Which isn’t to say that the book doesn’t have its deficiencies. It’s a somewhat clumsily constructed narrative that lacks a clear sense of direction, little attempt is made to draw together the various strands of the book’s arguments into a coherent conclusion, and some of the material appears extraneous to the matter at hand. The RLC section also includes some rather wince-making pronouncements and assumptions, and the account of Sauniere’s life and activities – albeit not terribly relevant to the authors’ thesis – appears to have been lifted directly from the Accursed Treasure / Plantard-ian / HBHG playbook, with little or no account taken of the many errors and canards that have come to light in the succeeding years.

These are the negatives, but there is still an awful lot in this book to find interesting, and to enjoy, and even occasionally to be quite enthralled by.

The book’s subtitle is “Unlocking the Mystery of a Long Lost Civilisation”, and its essential argument is that our civilisation is many thousands of years older than we have thus far been led to believe, and the authors demonstrate this through the analysis of various archaeological discoveries and oddities, but also, and for the most part, by plotting the location of many sacred sites throughout the world, and then factoring in polar shifts and earth crust displacement, in order that their positions might be determined many thousands of years previously, and in so doing the authors find the most extraordinary grid linked by latitudes either present or previous, that can only lead one to assume that a long-ago, and long-lost civilisation had the wherewithal both to traverse the globe, and to plot these navigations accurately, the end result being a worldwide network of sacred sites. One such place is Rennes-le-Chateau and its oft-discussed alignments, and here and elsewhere, due note is made of the importance of units of measure. It’s heady stuff at times, with its musings about the possibility of an antediluvian, maritime civilisation with global reach, that somehow ceased to exist due to some kind of natural catastrophe, but which nevertheless managed to leave the faintest of imprints upon the world, the vestiges of which are only now starting to come to light. The concept of the lost world of Atlantis inevitably enters the equation at this point, and the book presents some interesting ideas about how this ancient civilisation, assuming it existed, might lie buried beneath the ice of Antarctica.

The book also serves as – indeed, at times reads as – an overview of this field of study over the past few decades, from Charles Hapgood’s seminal Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings, through to the work of Erich von Daniken, Robert Bauval and Graham Hancock, and a host of others. The book also, as one would expect, has considerable geographic reach, and takes the reader to some of the most celebrated archaeological sites in the world, as well as some lesser known ones. The book certainly inspires one to find out more about some of these places, so fascinating in their own right, regardless of whether or not one buys into the authors’ overall thesis.

All in all, this is an enjoyable, interesting and at times illuminating and thought provoking book, that I would recommend to anyone with an interest in this sort of subject matter. For the most part, the authors steer a careful and sensible course between science and speculation, and it opens one’s mind to some immensely intriguing possibilities. The book contains an extensive bibliography and several appendices, and taken as a whole, and setting minor quibbles aside, it is, in my view, a very worthwhile book to own, and one that I have pleasure in commending.

I had forgotten your interest in The Atlantis Blueprint, Richard. I'm glad you reminded me, I recently purchased a book called THE ATLAS OF LEGENDARY LANDS ~ Fabled kingdoms, phantom islands, lost continents and other mythical worlds.

richard.webster · **Posted:** 09 Mar 2012 12:28 pm

rain wrote:

I had forgotten your interest in The Atlantis Blueprint, Richard. I'm glad you reminded me, I recently purchased a book called THE ATLAS OF LEGENDARY LANDS ~ Fabled kingdoms, phantom islands, lost continents and other mythical worlds.

What a beautiful, sumptuous looking book. I just ordered one; I couldn't resist it, terrible impulse shopper that I am. Can't wait to get it. Thanks, rain.

Crimson_Ghost · **Posted:** 09 Mar 2012 12:30 pm

roscoe wrote:

Dunkerque - Barcelona (i.e. Paris Meridian) = 666 miles

Skellig Michael to Bourges Cathedral = 666 miles - Angle 66.6 degrees. (That's 90 degrees minus the tilt angle of the earth)

Weighing of souls on the facade of Bourges Cathedral

That's the job of

ST MICHAEL

Distance from Barcelona to Bourges (St Michael crossing point) as a ratio of Barcelona to Dunkerque is 0.618 to 1

i.e. THE GOLDEN SECTION.

But hey! It's ALLLLLLL coincidence. The ancients couldn't possibly have done this, therefore they didn't. Go back to sleep.

Have a nice day.

Roscoe are you polluting the wrong section of the forum with your connect the dots game again? What`s all this got to do with Sauniere, please elaborate why you think whatever you think.

lovuian · **Posted:** 09 Mar 2012 5:09 pm

well I believe Everything is Connected and there are no coincidences
check my signature :wink:

Roscoe is preaching to the choir with me :lol:

I love that your bringing this up because I have been writing articles about
Genesis and the "Sons of God" who came down from the Heavens and found the daughters of Eve
beautiful and married them....they were the Giants and they were called "renown men (heroes)
and example is Hercules

In Boudets book
he brings up that the Celts favorite hero was Hercules

The other word for them was the Nephilim
in the Book of Enoch ...these were the ones who taught man how to build swords and spears about mathematics
stars and cosmetics for women.

Now God decides that evil reigns so man must be exterminated except for the pure one Noah
this story was placed up in the stained glass of Chartres
It seems St Louis IX and Blanche Castile were very interested in the Giants
as was Boudet
the Megaliths all around them were said in oral stories passed down from the Celts were built by the Giants of old

why do I say St Louis IX and Blanche because they placed in the stained glass some interesting pictures of the Giants
and not just a man giant also a woman giant.
To get back to the Antediluvian civilization...we are talking about the Nephilim in the Bible
a group of people who came down from the heavens and interbred with humans

Here is the stained glass windows even the academics are having a hard time explaining them
http://www.sacred-destinations.com/france/chartres-cathedral-window-photos/slides/w64_8681c-giant.htm
An intriguing scene in which a man carrying a club listens to a significantly smaller person. The cathedral guide says only, "These medallions are very difficult to understand." One suggestion made by scholars is that it depicts Genesis 6:4: "There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown" (KJV). Detail of the Noah Window, located at the west end of the north aisle. Like most of the windows in Chartres Cathedral, it dates from the early 13th century.

Here is one of the female giants
http://www.sacred-destinations.com/france/chartres-cathedral-window-photos/slides/w64_8682c-giant.htm

there are not just one but four or five about the Giants

what is interesting about this is that one of the Giants has a club in his hand
I have connected this Giant with the Giant called Orion
and that would be the Orion star system

I'm beginning to wonder if the Female giant is Virgo and that would mean Spica

I have found more possible evidence that the Angevins and Capetians may have believed they were related to
"am infernal bloodline" Richard the Lionheart is on record for saying this
Blanche was related to Richard and was St Louis.

Richard the Lionheart bloodline was traced from the time of Noah and Woden. It was through Edith wife of Henry I and Alfred the Great. Richard was said to be 6 foot 5 inches in height. A giant in the Middle Ages where people were small from lack of nourishment. Blanche and St Louis came from this Angevin bloodline.

Did these royals come from a antediluvian bloodline? They may have believed they did.
Blanche and St Louis placed this in the stained glass windows and passed their bibles that THEY commissioned to their family. How was a Pope going to stop them from reading it.

Now how does this connect with Saint Michael
Saint Michael
In the Book of Revelation, the War in Heaven is a battle between Michael the Archangel and his angels against the "dragon," or "ancient serpent," and his angels

There are few Dead Sea Scrolls that allude to the concept of a War in Heaven, such as: the Songs of the Sabbath Sacrifice (SSS) Song 5, 11Q13, 1QM and 4Q491-497.
a divine warrior who is involved in the conflict with Michael the Archangel in the futurist sense
The War Scroll (1QM), also known as War of the Sons of Light Against the Sons of Darkness, mentions angels who carry on a War in heaven while the Sons of Light combat the Sons of Darkness on Earth. During the last of the seven battles, the angels intervene to aid the Sons of Light. These angels of Light identify with the archangel Michael, while the angels of darkness identify with Belial.[5]

The Book of Daniel contains apocalyptic imagery of heavenly warfare between Michael as national angel of Israel and the "princes" (or archangels) of Persia and Greece
Another correlating story
there is the Celts
Tuatha Dé Danann was "the men of science who were gods," danann being here connected with dán, "knowledge."
In the Cúchulainn cycle they are supernatural beings and sometimes demons, helping or harming men, and in the Fionn cycle all these characteristics are ascribed to them. But the theory which prevailed most is that which connected them with the hills or mounds, the last resting-places of the mighty dead. Some of these bore their names, while other beings were also associated with the mounds (síd)--Fomorians and Milesian chiefs, heroes of the sagas, or those who had actually been buried in them. 3 Legend told how, after the defeat of the gods, the mounds were divided among them, the method

I compare Lugh with his spear ...to Michael with his spear

Sheila · **Posted:** 09 Mar 2012 7:13 pm

richard.webster · **Posted:** 10 Mar 2012 12:14 am

lovuian wrote:

I have found more possible evidence that the Angevins and Capetians may have believed they were related to
"am infernal bloodline" Richard the Lionheart is on record for saying this

Yes, there was a myth of descent from Melusine, the daughter of Satan.

Quote:

The chronicler Giraud le Cambrien reported that Richard I of England was fond of telling a tale according to which he was a descendant of a countess of Anjou who was in fact the fairy Melusine, concluding that his whole family "came from the devil and would return to the devil"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melusine

The Angevins were also renowned for their fierce temper, and the supposed diabolical connection was used as a slur by their enemies, but they may have played up to it themselves, either in jest, or for a bit of extra mystique.

Quote:

Legend clung to the House of Anjou, one such ran that they were descended from no less a person than Satan himself. It was related that Melusine, the daughter of Satan, was the demon ancestress of the Angevins. Her husband the Count of Anjou was perplexed when Melusine always left church prior to hearing of the mass. After pondering the matter he had her forcibly restrained by his knights while the service took place. Melusine reportedly tore herself from their grasp and flew through the roof, taking two of the couple's children with her and was never seen again.

http://www.englishmonarchs.co.uk/plantagenet.htm

Melusine is sometimes known as the dark princess of the forest, but some think that might be because she was of Moorish origin, hence the aversion to Mass. So it's probably quite a confused mythology. She's also associated with alchemy.

Quote:

This creature is associated with numerous stories and legends, and is imbued with symbolic meaning in alchemy. The most common iteration of the siren is as Melusine, a creature from medieval legend. Melusine (sometimes, Melusina) was, according to legend, beautiful woman with a disturbing tendency to transform into a serpent from the waist down while bathing; it is the discovery of this nature that triggers calamity.

As the story is most often told, the cursed maiden is discovered in the forest by Raymond, the Duke of Aquitaine, who begs her to marry him. She agrees, on condition that he never disturb her on a Saturday, when she bathes. Raymond eventually grows suspicious of his young wife, and spies on her- and his shocked reaction to her true appearance reveals his betrayal to Melusine, who transforms herself into a dragon and departs in a shrieking fury. This story can be viewed as a metaphor for sexuality, and the contradictory duality of the female nature as viewed through medieval eyes.

The same dual-nature symbolism is also at work in alchemy, which employs the siren as a more benevolent emblem of enlightenment- the siren of the philosophers. Alchemically, the siren’s two tails represent unity -of earth and water, body and soul- and the vision of Universal Mercury, the all-pervading anima mundi that calls out and makes the philosopher yearn to her.

http://symboldictionary.net/?p=1153

Renne · **Posted:** 10 Mar 2012 12:54 am

The Northern lights as seen from Iceland last night, can you see then

from England this time?

lovuian · **Posted:** 10 Mar 2012 3:15 am

richard.webster wrote:

lovuian wrote:

I have found more possible evidence that the Angevins and Capetians may have believed they were related to
"am infernal bloodline" Richard the Lionheart is on record for saying this

Yes, there was a myth of descent from Melusine, the daughter of Satan.

Quote:

The chronicler Giraud le Cambrien reported that Richard I of England was fond of telling a tale according to which he was a descendant of a countess of Anjou who was in fact the fairy Melusine, concluding that his whole family "came from the devil and would return to the devil"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melusine

The Angevins were also renowned for their fierce temper, and the supposed diabolical connection was used as a slur by their enemies, but they may have played up to it themselves, either in jest, or for a bit of extra mystique.

Quote:

Legend clung to the House of Anjou, one such ran that they were descended from no less a person than Satan himself. It was related that Melusine, the daughter of Satan, was the demon ancestress of the Angevins. Her husband the Count of Anjou was perplexed when Melusine always left church prior to hearing of the mass. After pondering the matter he had her forcibly restrained by his knights while the service took place. Melusine reportedly tore herself from their grasp and flew through the roof, taking two of the couple's children with her and was never seen again.

http://www.englishmonarchs.co.uk/plantagenet.htm

Melusine is sometimes known as the dark princess of the forest, but some think that might be because she was of Moorish origin, hence the aversion to Mass. So it's probably quite a confused mythology. She's also associated with alchemy.

Quote:

This creature is associated with numerous stories and legends, and is imbued with symbolic meaning in alchemy. The most common iteration of the siren is as Melusine, a creature from medieval legend. Melusine (sometimes, Melusina) was, according to legend, beautiful woman with a disturbing tendency to transform into a serpent from the waist down while bathing; it is the discovery of this nature that triggers calamity.

As the story is most often told, the cursed maiden is discovered in the forest by Raymond, the Duke of Aquitaine, who begs her to marry him. She agrees, on condition that he never disturb her on a Saturday, when she bathes. Raymond eventually grows suspicious of his young wife, and spies on her- and his shocked reaction to her true appearance reveals his betrayal to Melusine, who transforms herself into a dragon and departs in a shrieking fury. This story can be viewed as a metaphor for sexuality, and the contradictory duality of the female nature as viewed through medieval eyes.

The same dual-nature symbolism is also at work in alchemy, which employs the siren as a more benevolent emblem of enlightenment- the siren of the philosophers. Alchemically, the siren’s two tails represent unity -of earth and water, body and soul- and the vision of Universal Mercury, the all-pervading anima mundi that calls out and makes the philosopher yearn to her.

http://symboldictionary.net/?p=1153

Yes the Angevins's definitely had a mysterious legend involved with their bloodline
And Richard lots of legends surrounding them
they definitely are quite an intriguing family

I think this Arthur legend that Eleanor and Henry had an infatuation visiting Glastonbury is interesting
and the Pen-Dragon connection interesting

Elizabeth the I in her heraldry has the Red Dragon

and look at her Portrait

the sleeve looks like a serpent and the gown has the all seeing eye
It really is alchemy
Elizabeth I. The "Rainbow Portrait", c. 1600, an allegorical representation of the Queen, become ageless in her old age

According to Ovid, Astraea abandoned the earth at the end of the Iron Age.[2] Fleeing from the new wickedness of humanity, she ascended to heaven to become the constellation Virgo;[3] the scales of justice she carried became the nearby constellation Libra, reflected in her symbolic association with Justitia in Latin culture. In the Tarot, the 8th card, Justice, with a figure of Justitia, can thus be considered related to the figure of Astræa on historical iconographic grounds.

According to legend, Astræa will one day come back to Earth, bringing with her the return of the utopian Golden Age of which she was the ambassador.

Elizabeth was called Astraea the fairy queen

I wonder if Elizabeth saw the connection of the Dragon bloodline

lovuian · **Posted:** 10 Mar 2012 4:01 am

roscoe wrote:

Oh and by the way

555 miles

But remember

IT'S ALLLLLL COINCIDENCE

Roscoe I see that the lines converge on Bourges
and it was constructed at the same time as Chartres
Bourges was
he cathedral has been a site of Christian worship since the third century, when the Roman city of Avaricum sheltered the first Christian community in Gaul.

the stained glass windows go back to 1215

but it has a astronomical clock
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-bFu8cy5-7-w/TkGL7OnSDhI/AAAAAAAAAEQ/bbKOKQ4huSE/s1600/Bourges+cathedral2011+006.JPG

The Astronomical Clock of Bourges cathedral dates back to 1424 and was made by the canon and mathematician Jean Furosis. The clock is made of a tower holding two clocks, painted red and decorated with flowers, shields and golden lines.

The higher clock shows the hours and minutes and dates from the 19th century.

The lower clock is older, dating from 1424 and displays the lunar cycle, the height of the sun and the signs of the zodiac.

The crypt of Bourges cathedral is amongst the largest in France
http://www.frenchmoments.com/Bourges_Cathedral.html

this is St Michael the ArchAngel weighing souls in the stained glass windows of Bourges
http://www.sacred-destinations.com/france/bourges-cathedral-photos/slides/w12_6167c
The Weighing of Souls. St. Michael the Archangel holds the scale in which two souls are weighed. The devil interferes by grabbing the scales at the top and a smaller demon hangs on one side to sway the results. Two souls wait in the wings for their turn to be judged.

roscoe · **Joined:** 02 Dec 2006 3:44 pm **Posts:** 6956

Crimson_Ghost wrote:

roscoe wrote:

Dunkerque - Barcelona (i.e. Paris Meridian) = 666 miles

Skellig Michael to Bourges Cathedral = 666 miles - Angle 66.6 degrees. (That's 90 degrees minus the tilt angle of the earth)

Weighing of souls on the facade of Bourges Cathedral

That's the job of

ST MICHAEL

Distance from Barcelona to Bourges (St Michael crossing point) as a ratio of Barcelona to Dunkerque is 0.618 to 1

i.e. THE GOLDEN SECTION.

But hey! It's ALLLLLLL coincidence. The ancients couldn't possibly have done this, therefore they didn't. Go back to sleep.

Have a nice day.

Roscoe are you polluting the wrong section of the forum with your connect the dots game again? What`s all this got to do with Sauniere, please elaborate why you think whatever you think.

“Vu Curé de Névian, Chez Géllis, Chez Carrière, Vu Cros et SECRET.”

Saunière wrote this in his diary on September 29th 1891 i.e. on the Feast of St Michael and All Angels

Probably a SECRET to the ANGELIC Society. 'Viva Angelina' next to Géllis, murdered on Samhain.

Quote:

The three parchments are composed:

a) of a genealogy of the counts de Rhédae since the origin, act of 1243, which carry the seal of Blanche de Castille (from where confusion in the spirit of some to believe in the treasure of this queen),

b) of an act of 1608 of François-Pierre d' Hautpoul, who gives a complement of genealogy since 1240 with a comment in bad Latin,

c) of a will of Henri d' Hautpoul of April 24, 1695, which carries seal and signature of the testator, with in has on the right the letter P.S. in Gothic, and a Latin invocation with five saints:

Antoine de Padoue,

Antoine de Egypt,

Sulpice de Bourges,

Roch de Montpellier

and Marie-Madeleine.

From LE CERCLE D'ULYSSE by Jean DELAUDE

(Incidentally Montpellier is next to Maguelonne)

MAYBE IT'S TIME YOU GOT THE POINT.

Left to right - Feast of the PASSOVER (Angel of death PASSES OVER - The Angel of Death is St Michael) :
St John the Baptist - Feast day 24th June (i.e. Midsummers Day) There he is pointing straight up:
Adoration of the Magi - Who followed a star at the Winter Solstice.

AND IN THE CHURCH OF MARIE MADELEINE - RENNES LE CHATEAU

JESUS HIMSELF POINTING UP

viewtopic.php?f=5&t=2258&p=100023#p100023 <---------Another lost discussion

roscoe · **Joined:** 02 Dec 2006 3:44 pm **Posts:** 6956

Christianso is an Island off the Island of Bornholm. See THE SECRET below.

The two lines cross at Avebury EXACTLY!!!

But remember it's ALLLLLLL! coincidence. :wink:

Don't worry I've only got sixteen more "coincidences" to go

ARTHUR'S STONE

Maen Ceti, - Neolithic burial tomb dating back to 2500 B.C.

roscoe · **Joined:** 02 Dec 2006 3:44 pm **Posts:** 6956

Of course when we disect that angle we get

But remember it's ALLLLLL!!!! coincidence

Not many more "coincidences" to go now.

roscoe · **Joined:** 02 Dec 2006 3:44 pm **Posts:** 6956

NOT MANY MORE 'COINCIDENCES' TO GO NOW

Lourdes, as in Our Lady of Lourdes. It's on the Greenwich meridian you know.

More 'coincidences' tomorrow (maybe). I'll give you a breather

But CHI ReHO for now

jlockest · **Joined:** 13 Aug 2010 5:37 pm **Posts:** 972

Maranatha equated Michael with Mercury and Thoth. Elsewhere, Enoch is equated with Thoth.
Doesn't the Michael ley line go through Royston as well (http://www.roystoncave.co.uk/ley_lines.html)

The earth's timeline is interesting - from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_o ... ry_of_life

The basic timeline of a 4.6 billion year old Earth, with approximate dates:

3.8 billion years of simple cells (prokaryotes),
3 billion years of photosynthesis,
2 billion years of complex cells (eukaryotes),
1 billion years of multicellular life,
600 million years of simple animals,
570 million years of arthropods (ancestors of insects, arachnids and crustaceans),
550 million years of complex animals,
500 million years of fish and proto-amphibians,
475 million years of land plants,
400 million years of insects and seeds,
360 million years of amphibians,
300 million years of reptiles,
200 million years of mammals,
150 million years of birds,
130 million years of flowers,
65 million years since the non-avian dinosaurs died out,
2.5 million years since the appearance of the genus Homo,
200,000 years of anatomically modern humans,
25,000 years since the disappearance of Neanderthal traits from the fossil record.
13,000 years since the disappearance of Homo floresiensis from the fossil record.

Why think that we're the first civilisation - and even why think that other 'reptilian' civilisations couldn't have existed?

What I found odd - if you take the 'giants' and Michael and equate them to Genesis - why are they portrayed with simple tools? Why a club and spear? Just the best representation the artist could achieve for maybe something more powerful? Didn't Michael have a flaming sword?

The LRB implied that the stories of old weren't about mythical objects and that the artefacts in the myths may have existed. Presumably this was believed to a certain extent until quite recently - with the 'mystical stones' - Coronation stone and Scotland and a potential tie in with Jacob's pillow, the Tuatha and the Stone of Scone. Rumour, myth and innuendo.

Roscoe, can I ask if you do have a tie in with these lines, Michael and RLC/Sauniere?

roscoe · **Joined:** 02 Dec 2006 3:44 pm **Posts:** 6956

Well you do wonder why nobody has ever noticed this before

Dunkerque to Notre Dame de Marceille = 544 miles

Notre Dame to Bourges Cathedral =272 miles

i.e. EXACTLY halfway.

But remember it's ALLLLLLL!! coincidence.

Don't worry only another dozen or so COINCIDENCES to go.

roscoe · **Joined:** 02 Dec 2006 3:44 pm **Posts:** 6956

Oh by the way

The street going approximately North South is called Avinguda Meridiana

The interesting piece of Dunkerque (Fort Mardyck) was destroyed during WWII

L'épée du Marquis

tingra · **Posted:** 10 Mar 2012 1:02 pm

What does any of this have to do with Rennes le Chateau?
Perhaps it should be moved it to miscellaneous where it belongs.....whadya reckon :lol:

Crimson_Ghost · **Posted:** 10 Mar 2012 1:47 pm

tingra wrote:

What does any of this have to do with Rennes le Chateau?
Perhaps it should be moved it to miscellaneous where it belongs.....whadya reckon :lol:

My point exactly, I asked a simple and direct question to the one person who continually demands direct answers and facts and all we get is a game of connect the dots. Unless Sauniere was making his fortune selling puzzle booklets, get to the point Roscoe what in your opinion ties all your line drawings to the priest.

Arcadia Discussion Zone

Coincidence Right?

Who is online