Arcadia Discussion Zone

Is this meant to describe Renne and Roger?

Guten Morgen Mein Herr,

It wasn't MEANT to describe anyone.
It is merely an observation that both activities are worthy of censure.
For my own part I have no evidence that Roger has ever indulged in either!

However, it raises the thought provoking question as to whether it is appropriate to be censorious towards those whose elevator doesn't always make the Penthouse suite!

'By their fruits shall ye know them'

As someone quite famous is alleged to have said.
TD

I see.

Wow !
There you have it folks !

Another heavy weight contribution from Renne.
You've got to admire her forensic dissection of the subject, the thoughtful and telling insight which conveys, instinctively, so much more than mere words.

Mary don't let the fact that you've not actually finished the book yet hold you back. You don't need PC, take it on the road, your adoring public await you !
Deep joy !
TD.

Who is the guy covering his face like a wanted criminal?

I know who the guy in the white shirt is. I`d say he`s 10 yr.

younger than I am, but looks 10 years older.

Have you ever seen a photo of the infamous Thomas D. before Roger?

I don`t imagine that an image of Roger would show up on film. You 2 should just stick to

your creepy death-cult.

DSV? My daughter has a PhD in Psych, you don`t have off-spring do you?

Mary,
Whilst I am very happy to acknowledge your inalienable right to fantasize about men younger than youself, I'm afraid that I'm going to have to disappoint you.
In the interests of clarity and before you begin to bombard an entirely blameless individual with all kinds of imprecations and curses I must tell that isn't the erstwhile Mr D.

Though your post does have unsettling echoes of the reasons that Davinho gave you recently for leaving other Fora.
Am I now to be stalked by you ? Should I invest in extra security for the rabbits ?
Glenn Close ? If only !
TD

Well, as you know we are still waiting for Hanks opinion...........

.....Maybe she's playing far too rough for a lady who's been to the moon..........

I'm sure you'll agree; its all in the delivery
TD

You wish.

Actually we`re probably about the same age.

Well,
As John once said, " whatever gets you through the night"

Or was it Kenny Rogers?

Either way, just so we are clear;

"It aint me babe, oh no, it aint me babe
it aint me you're looking for, babe.

But. like I say its entirely your prerogative, if thats the face you wish to ascribe to me.
I imagine that there are those on the Forum, who probably know who he is. If he is caught up in an earth quake or beset by a plague of loccusts we'll know who to blame!

BTW Loved the Chilli Spam on 'Painting Geometry', I'm sure Sheila is loving the mindless defiance. It seems to bear out the theory that upon entering our dotage we return to childhood!

Have a great Day!

TD

edited to correct typo.

I take your point but maybe She is under the misaprehension that she's supplying the requiste dramatic 'light and Shade'?

I think Felix is spending rather too much time at his Dacha. Maybe he has taken too well to the life of a Dachnik!
TD

And you guys keep feeding the dying embers don't you.....why are you trying to keep the fire going?

you are like good little boy scouts....away and write something creative FFS!

Dib Dib Dib......Dob Dob Dob !

you see Thomas old bean, theres the rub....it's the crap posts that get the answers & the responses!

nothing personal, don't mind me i'm in a mood!

"Monty Python and the Holy Grail" - let`s get back to Patrice`s book,

shall we? You 2 will do anything to prevent a discussion of "City of Secrets". You never answered, have you read it?

Why aren`t you on your own forum, Roger, the IBJ Masters Forum? I notice you just write in French on there.

Did the Templars bring the large Sun Stone to the Pyranees?

"Don`t try the Queen of Diamonds, she`ll beat you if she`s able."

The chili is the sauce is for you to use when you eat your hats, get it? -
(not my joke.)

Is that MOOT fellow Italian?

Did you two send this guy to follow me home?

Here's my question.

Is it just me or does anyone else think that this area of study is being deliberately obscured, which if common sense is applied there must be something there of worth.

I'm of two minds as to what someone's motivations are, in my more paranoid moments I think there is a concerted effort to not hi-jack but completely destroy the validity of argument that Chaplin or what is behind her are trying to relay.

Some would argue Chaplin is perfectly capable of doing that herself by writing what is essentially the most chopped up, badly edited, self-indulgent book I have come across in this genre.

On further inspection "City of Secrets" is a smart book.
One of the most moving books I have come across.
I don't believe a single person could possibly break the message that lies behind "City of Secrets" without extreme study of underlying structures.
Each component alone takes years of study to even penetrate it's mysteries without making the mistake of sitting on the initial layer let alone creating an intergrated formation of an overall hypothesis and even than it is unlikely to remain anything but a hypothesis for most.

The 3 turning points for me have been.
1.) science,
2.) understanding the politics/philosopy
3.) geography (geopolitical ramifications and alliances)

I'm going into "Pity Party" mode here. In my position I have had to make things from scratch.
I don't have the contacts, I don't have the access to the primary documents and I don't speak the languages or have the endless resources that most people have which could help me.
That being said I don't think I've done as bad as I thought I would.

Do I believe there is a moment when I can honestly say I started to gain clarity on the book and the ideas. The answer is yes, but it took a few things coalescing into a relatively commonsensical argument.

1.) An understanding of the Kabbalah in the usage of codes and cyphers.

2.) The penitential movement and factional politics of Catholisicm. (including the idealogy of spiritual materialism, and philosophies of the saints)

3.) Revolutionary wars in Europe, Allies, Enemies and financing - wartime communication stucture and tools. (basic warcraft)

4.) Comparative religions - temple strutures, labyrinths and mazes.

5.) Study of hydralulics, classical mechanics and engineering.

6.) Study of chemistry, gases, electricity and light.

7.) Study of the 3 G's - geology, geography and geometry.

8.) Astrology/Astronomy, rituals and weather patterns.

Sheila:

Sheila, Have you or have you not studied in whole or part the subjects I have listed to gain a better understanding of the core message of the book "City of Secrets"?

If so, do you concur that a true understanding of the book can only be ascertained by acquiring an understanding of the above subject matter?

yes to all the above.....

I think you misunderstand what or should i say who has become the problem on this forum...which is the reason why for at least a year now nearly all of our communications go via PM's or e-mails.

Thank-you for your honesty.



Oh, If it's me I'm sorry, that's all I can offer.

No Rain, it's not you....far from it

Well said.
Poor thing.
I think that Unhappy Felix should've taken action long time ago and have banned the spammers: Renne & Lovuian. (sorry girls)

True though.

Eginolf







Oh but we are having so much fun

yes but its no fun for us lot having to sift through all that drivel until we come to something apertaining to the core thread

Rain is a new comer and has studied this topic very well in my opinion, like me she has the language problem but it hasnt stopped her getting the facts right most of the time and she doesnt make things fit just for the hell of it

Sheila is also right....we do most things in private now and thats a shame as we have a lot of good stuff we would like to share but this is not the place to do that any more....the forum has been spoilt by the spammers and idiots that cut and paste pictures and crap just to disrupt the threads or to gain attention or to make up some obscure family history etc etc etc