http://www.renneslechateau.com/forums/v ... c95f8afe19
Hello, The debunkers often claim that Plantard during questioning by Judge Jean Pierre confessed "deception" ... this call was due to the investigation by the magistrate on the death of Roger Patrice Pellat, that Plantard was given as Grand Master Priory of Sion ... the judge was helped by a flurry of letters of denunciation by Dagobert fire ... But the deception involved Plantard claimed the title, that of legitimate descendant of Clovis, and thus heir to the throne of France ... nothing else, I did not judge charged with investigating RLC. plantardienne This fad comes over 50 years, with its actions in the Latin Academy, one of the many organizations due to his creative spirit ... before that, whether in Galatians Alpha and National Renewal there is no trace of the Merovingian lineage ... All those who knew Plantard speak of him as a cultured man, reserved ... it is hard to admit that he "believed" to be really the descendant of Chilperic! Why then taking the risk as Boudet (as Magdalene?) To move to an eccentric offering a little sick this genealogy crazy! There is no clear information on the sources of this change, moving from a chivalrous Fascism Christian and an atheist ... but popular royalism can be given by Coppens track ... There is not that Plantard who thought the Merovingians back to lead the country, already in 1934 a certain Lionel de Roulet with a few friends had created the "Merovingian Party", this de Roulet was the brother of Simone de Beauvoir (the one who reported it). During the war it Roulet was charged with opening an institute in Portugal, this institute was commissioned to do the Promotion of Free France and abroad. By the end of the war, Roulet continues its missions to the Gaullist networks (Vienna, Belgrade, Casablanca ...). This membership Gaullist networks will be confirmed later by Simone de Beauvoir. When de Gaulle left office, Robert Schuman offered a position in Italy, then to the Council of Europe. We know that Plantard also participated in networks Gaullists, without going into details he was suspected of money transfer (from Switzerland to France), to be part of the Committees of Public Hi, SAC ... It is therefore surprising to see that this tradition of "Merovingian Party" launched in 1934 by Lionel de Roulet is found in a Priory of Sion led by Pierre Plantard, and that these two characters find themselves in networks Gaullists ... before the takeover of General ... Greetings, Philemon.
Philemon Hello, There are much better when we learn that the Camarguaise Participation whose manager was RP Pelat was prominent shareholders of the Gaullists. It is for this reason that Pelat has been described as GM of PS. The rent of this association was paid by the company whose manager was Pelat ........... you said weird. Qt the three protagonists of which you speak, they are all three dcd, Peace to their souls. Another thing too, Philemon, in your post you say that the transfer was from Switzerland to France, the opposite was place and that from the exile of De Gaulle, to raise money for the future Gaullist party, the RPF. What I like most about your message, what are the three dots after the word Coppens. had to smugglers ...... and no matter their past during the war. Some of these were again virgin in what you call the Gaullist networks ..... by exploiting the Templar archives for instance. Others have developed friendships with others temporary, new horizons .... but you know as well as I do. Perhaps it would be good that you give details of the party Merovingian, even if only by personal curiosity ..... Regards to all Thy
Hi Thierry, Thanks for the clarification (and correction). Sorry, I do not have much info on this party Merovingian ... And the suspension points following Coppens were firstly to give the source of my info, and especially to say that following its investigation, I left him, not by ignorance but by disagreement. This post came after the publication of an apocryphal document Roux, Patrick Mensior, where I saw a first policy statement in the resumption of the case of RLC in the 60s. This is long enough to explain, but quickly said, I think Plantard was looking for a "real mystery" to establish his political * and place in history. And he found in Rennes elements to do: A Legitimist priest who spent a lot of money, a former Visigothic capital, legends, parchments missing treasure hunters who find nothing ... if not new leads. I therefore want to say that Plantard had his plan on arriving at Rennes and he tried to adapt, sometimes with forceps, the items he had found, not vice versa. As he did with the "Centuries." What I'm trying to show is that it is not because Plantard is not the descendant of Clovis, that there is no affair at Rennes. That's what trying to do the debunkers: still from the "great story", to which no one believes in dismantling one of whoppers (Mass trafficking, inheritance Merovingian descent Christ ...), and Finally, depending on the mood of the author, that Saunière was a ... (your choice), but in no case there is mystery ... although now, each of debunkers leaves a door open ... Cherisey becomes heavy to wear and some issues are still no answers. Finally, I said in this post, that Plantard had not "invented" the "party Merovingian", as one who had done was anything but a stooge and that we found this gentleman in the same groups that Plantard ... and it was a Gaullist "Historic" ... Hi, Philip. * As per strategy, we know that many groups said "stay behind" companies used it more or less secret and esoteric to conceal their subversive activities.
Hello Philemon, After quick research, I have very little about Roulet was to be the "redneck" Simone de Beauvoir, so I stumbled upon the site of Tautavel Man. The interesting article gives details Wilpédia yet implausible, I doubt that a colonel on the eve of a war parte convalo .... and want to make this a colonel Gaullist historical ..... even with quotation marks, it is going a little fast. I doubt that Plantard also may have played a key role in the Gaullist organization, especially for the periods 45/56, it has necessarily been helped by the only ones who had the power at the time, the Gaullists, drives in this by someone who would become the eminence grise of the General, Jacques Foccart. He alone with his network had sufficient power to enter docs in the BNF without control. That's why I do not believe at all in the omnipresence of PP to want this or that institute new order. To demonstrate the role played by the Com / R. Div ... in the exploitation of Templar archives. (Where PP was this operation?) And then the Gaullists would they accept that? I think not. In his letter of 07/03/85, de Sede tells me that PP came into contact with him in 1960 (in the same letter also Sède of writing that there is no relationship between EO and PS of 56 as well as the complete absence of relationship between Gisors and Rennes) came to see if de Sede, so it's probably on "order" .... Gaullist networks of the time? This time he had called the rank of "Captain Way .... " Kind regards Thierry