Some of the rubbish "Caledfwlch" has posted on this thread makes me sick.
What has any of this got to do with "Caledfwlch"?
What proof have you got that Barbara is the one making fabrications? Why do you automatically take the bishop's side every time? Barbara's contributions have been entertaining and enlightening. Yours have been boring and confrontational. YOU SIR! are the one messing up the board not Mrs Green!
More angry comments follow:
She was not present during the 1990 vigil, so how do her misconceptions arise? The version she offers does not tally with the bishop's account.
Caldefwlch was not present either as has "No Connection" to Manchester. Why does he care what Barabara says about a vigil that took place 20 years ago???
The only "ego" I am witnessing is yours. Why do you keep attacking the bishop year in and year out with your totally unsubstantiated accusations?
Why do you
care, Caldefwlch, if you have "No Connection" to Manchester? Your obsessive defence of someone you don't know, have never met and have "No Connection" to is baffling, perhaps even slightly disturbing.
After a weekend rest "Caledfwlch" then piped up with:
When you say "we", you mean you and David Farrant presumably? Neither of you have anything to do with the bishop or his work, whether that be investigatory or otherwise. Looking for excuses not to respond openly and honestly on this forum when you overstep the line is something you both have in
And you also have nothing to do with the bishop or his work, unless you lied about having "No connection" to Manchester.
We deserve to know the truth. I'll ask you again. Are you connected to Bishop Manchester?