Jeez, Caledfwlch. There was no need to fragment your response in such an annoying way.
But here goes...
I didn't happen "to be following the events in the brief duration it took place".
I have followed the blog almost from its beginning, having discovered its URL on a social network site.
Between you and me, I doubt that highly. If you're a follower of the blog, is your profile featured on it?
You know very well they have been removed and I am not about to repeat defamation on a public forum because, let's face it, your comments were libellous.
So, essentially, it's ok for you to say
I was making offensive and abusive comments (an accusation), but not actually say what they were?
What a bloody joke. I mean, how about I accuse you
of libel for making false claims against me
(which they are).
For the record, I certainly wasn't being abusive or offensive. Content removed
abusive or offensive. And look at the way he decided to cover his tracks
. Absolutely pathetic.
No. I don't comprehend it at all.
Why am I not surprised.
That such a group was "set up by VRS sympathisers/propagandists" is your opinion. It is not a fact. How were you featured? You have not said which is telling in itself. Clearly you cannot quote the bishop or anyone close to him, or you would have done so. I think you should withdraw the accusation as you have failed to provide any evidence for it.
First you'd have to show where I've said the Bishop thinks I'm a Farrant follower. Then, you'd actually have to bother reading the link I provided, rather than continuing your childishness.
Are you serious? Someone communicates with you PRIVATELY and divulges private information about you and you publicly expose him and get him banned?
Yes, that's correct. The messages were harassing/stalky in nature. Thus, I deemed him worthy of reporting. It wasn't my intention to ban him, per se. But I guess his actions were against forum policy. So, good riddance to him.
Are you mad?
How was him communicating privately something "a threatening gesture"? Did he threaten to make it public? Did he even intimate he would do anything with this private information which would give you pause for thought? You are acting paranoid if he didn't.
Sending me along an private address that is not publicly available and then saying "you should
be rattled", well, any sane person could see what his game was.
And you got him banned? What's to stop him now taking his revenge by revelaing whatever it is you don't want to be revealed?
Well, if he did that, he'd simply be proving me right, wouldn't he.
I mean, "revenge" for being banned off a public forum, then publicly revealing a private address? That's pretty f***ed up, I'd say.
Keep in mind he was also yabbering away about David's personal residence too, so the guy's clearly a nutter.
Just take a look at your own blogs, forums, boards, and all the other people's blogs and boards where you post.
Um, considering the wealth of stuff I've written, you're gonna have to be a lot
more specific there.
I don't need to elaborate because your own paronioa compels you to falsify claims about people you don't know, who you have nothing in common with and, most important, want absolutely nothing to do with you.
Wow, you gave yourself
a get-out-of-jail-free card!
I took the time to link you to info, you can't be bothered doing the same. Says a lot about ya, sport.
In fact, I'll go so far as to say you're now libeling me
. So, if you can't back up what you say, I'd suggest you retract your accusations. You know, for courtesy's sake.
That is you superimposing your distorted perception on a now ex-member who can't respond.
Except I'm also backed up by the actions of the Mod. Their decision to ban him, not mine.
A bit cowardly of you, isn't it?
Not at all. You're the one who keeps discussing him. I'm just responding.
There is nothing in what you have said so far to intimate that George was trying to intimidate you. Quite the opposite. You have tried to intimidate him by using cry-baby tactics and getting him banned.
Intimidate him how? Reveal his private address? Personal info, what?
Gimme a break. The guy used a single name. Didn't talk much about himself and discussed the location of Patsy as well as David. Clearly, the bloke had an obsession with private residences.
You didn't get your way immediately, so you stamped your feet like a spoilt brat and threw all your toys out of the pram!
Nope, I contacted the authoritahs, who promptly (and justly) showed him the door. The way such loonies should be dealt with.
Maybe somebody ought to raise more about you publicly and summarily deal with you?
Again, it's not like I told people where George lived. I didn't reveal anything personal about him. I talked about the harassing actions he was taking against me. Get a grip, Caledfwlch.