RLC - The work of the Collective Unconscious

roscoe · **Joined:** 02 Dec 2006 3:44 pm **Posts:** 6956

Sheila wrote:

roscoe wrote:

Hate to tell you this but you don't agree with Jean Luc Robin and he used to live in Rennes le Chateau in fact he was elected Mayor.

Jean Luc Robin once said:

"Henry Lincoln is wrong by being right too soon"

Be that as it may you don't agree with the following people.

Pierre Jarnac
Phillip Coppens
Frank Daffos
Mariano Tomatis
Jean Luc Chaumeil
Gerard de Sede
Pierre Plantard

and lastly

Philippe de Cherisey.

You're on your own darlin'

i know that and i agree with you Roscoe...i'm way out there.

She's blond you know.

hans peper · **Posted:** 05 Jul 2012 5:09 pm

jlockest wrote:

Sheila wrote:

i would swear none of you actually take the time to read my posts...i set the whole thing out logically for you in the post above.

Pas.... Mouvement des jambes pour marcher qui consiste à mettre un pied devant l'autre....a step.

Pas de tentation
Pas de Calais
Pas de danse
Pas de la Roque
Pas de deux

None of the above mean NO or NONE...they mean STEP.

Sorry, I thought I quoted your post where you equated two different forms of the phrase - one including au - ie 'au pas de...'

I'm a bit lost. If pas obviously means step, then why has it been translated (in general) as something other than step? Surely every English person who spoke French would have pointed out the same error?
I've tried a few automated translation tools and they all come up with 'no' rather than step.

Are you saying:
pas de never means no/not
pas de sometimes means no/not
pas de in this phrase never means no/not

You are working like bureaucrats.

It is a coded parchement, and if you decode it, you expect finest french.

If you decode " nix tentation " or " zero tentation " or " ex tentation " you will understand.

You find pentgons in the landscape, crapping cocks, horses in a beard and this is ok, but in a codet parchment you await french without any mistake in an absolut correct form.

The question is : what sence gives the "step". Sheila, what conclusions ?

jlockest · **Joined:** 13 Aug 2010 5:37 pm **Posts:** 972

hans peper wrote:

jlockest wrote:

Sheila wrote:

i would swear none of you actually take the time to read my posts...i set the whole thing out logically for you in the post above.

Pas.... Mouvement des jambes pour marcher qui consiste à mettre un pied devant l'autre....a step.

Pas de tentation
Pas de Calais
Pas de danse
Pas de la Roque
Pas de deux

None of the above mean NO or NONE...they mean STEP.

Sorry, I thought I quoted your post where you equated two different forms of the phrase - one including au - ie 'au pas de...'

I'm a bit lost. If pas obviously means step, then why has it been translated (in general) as something other than step? Surely every English person who spoke French would have pointed out the same error?
I've tried a few automated translation tools and they all come up with 'no' rather than step.

Are you saying:
pas de never means no/not
pas de sometimes means no/not
pas de in this phrase never means no/not

You are working like bureaucrats.

It is a coded parchement, and if you decode it, you expect finest french.

If you decode " nix tentation " or " zero tentation " or " ex tentation " you will understand.

You find pentgons in the landscape, crapping cocks, horses in a beard and this is ok, but in a codet parchment you await french without any mistake in an absolut correct form.

The question is : what sence gives the "step". Sheila, what conclusions ?

Hans,

Is Pax French and isn't key feminine? And what century French should I expect it to be? IE when was the parchment authored as doesn't French, like English not only vary over time, but also over location?