Arcadia Discussion Zone

O M G...

Not only is such a deception a punishable offence, but an unacceptable consequence of such behaviour, particularly in a genre ridden with fraud and deceit, is the continued manipulation of the public, particularly with regard to artefacts holding strong religious and political connotations. This begs the question: should the genre self-regulate itself? And if the answer is ‘yes’, then this brings me to the following point.

The whistle was blown long ago, it's just nobody ever listened at the time.

maybe go back to when the subject first reared it's head dear boy....the "protracted discussions" where between the believers only.

.
Thank you for your remarks, however, it is unfortunate that the Priest is not around to respond to your criticism of his handywork. Those documents that he wrote are highly cryptic and contain subtle coding and unexpected word grouping designed to confuse the unwary. It obviously worked, though encrypted a century ago. It has, for the most part achieved some of his objectives in revealing his hidden caches in a logical sequence. Thanks to the diligence of our research team ably led by Ben Hammott. However there is yet more therin. Our researches continue, fortunately.
Bill Kersey.

During the course of John's documentaries and experiments, he caught the attention of a UK film maker named Bruce Burgess of BLUEBOOK FILMS with the Discovery Channel. Bruce had made a documentary for Discovery about the legendary Ark of the Covenant. Have researching the subject extensively, one of the ideas that fascinated him was the prospect of re-creating the Ark of the Covenant. Having known of John through the film industry, Bruce commissioned him to partake in a new documentary for the Discovery Channel about the creation and testing of such a device. The device worked, an electronic fog, orbs, zippy tiny lights appeared out of thin air, and very small light forms described as angelic miniature forms appeared to circle the angels atop the Ark. There are video links, as well as links to the documentary below. As things turned out, this Ark vanished, it was stolen! We were compelled to re-create another, made only of materials available to the ancients, with a power source built right inside. Legends say it was a radio to god. It was considered to be the very first weapon of mass destruction, having been carried into battle on many occasions to secure a victory. The second Ark has 2 transceiver tesla coils wound oppositely and has the ability to be used as an ancient radio. Unsuppressed lightning strikes will reach as far as 6 feet or so from each solid brass eagle. If suppressed and modulated, it certainly does make a very powerful radio. Also during John's experiments with his other tesla equipment, he achieved effects such as levitation, transmutation of elements, creation of new compounds, time manipulations, rapid ageing of samples, disappearing samples, and so on. The tesla coils are resonating frequencies that disturb the natural resonance that binds matter.

A 'working copy' of the Ark ? define 'working'..............
Oh puleeze!
Looks like A&E is too busy tonight.

TD

Are you talking to me? I'm not sure what you mean by A&E (accident & emergency), Thomas?
The following link may help you to understand what they were trying to achieve. I'm not a electrical engineer but I believe it's been postulated that the ark is either a condensor or capacitor.
So IMO they designed according to those principles and the descriptions of the ark.



http://www.hutchisoneffect.ca/Ark%20Of% ... %20II.html

If you need a further explanation of "working model" let me know.

In order for something to be a 'working copy' of an object one would have to have the 'working original'
to copy exactly and comprehension of its design and function. Does that seem logical to you?
Do you know of anyone who has the working original to copy?

A 'working copy ' of a postulated theory is only an 'imagining' based on what you describe as 'belief'.
When did the Old Testament prove to be factual?

TD

I'm not going to get dragged into playing semantics with you at this moment Thomas.
If you're fishing for more information - let me just straight out say 'there is' but there is no point discussing here or anywhere

.

Gosh, you sound more like Voldemort every day!

'working copy' is illogical for the reasons given, call it semantics if you like.

As AG says sooner or later the genre needs to become self regulating and that's where verifiable evidence has a role.

TD

As AG says sooner or later the genre needs to become self regulating and that's where verifiable evidence has a role.

Hi Rain, Did they cover the Ark model with pure gold? No wonder it was stolen.

The question therefore remains are you trying to say that "Ark of the convenant" replica was not made Thomas, and why?
Are you trying to say the website is manufactured? Are you saying the picture is doctored? And why keep invoking Roger into this as if he's somehow guilty of what? I don't know what you're trying to say Thomas, but I can sure say I'm not Roger, why keep bringing it up? I don't think anyone else but you keeps thinking I'm him. It's weird and frankly an insult to me. As if I can't speak for myself.

It's not possible, by definition, to have an 'exact copy' , 'working copy' or 'replica' of something if no one has seen the original!!!!!