Arcadia Discussion Zone

Forums dedicated to history's mysteries, Rennes-le-Château and beyond…

Read the Arcadia Forum House Rules

It is currently 18 Jun 2013 7:54 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 929 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ... 38  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 09 Apr 2012 4:57 pm 
Offline
Grand Master
User avatar

Joined: 19 Nov 2008 11:01 am
Posts: 1702
Tertius, a little progress is better than none.. it is still progress.

_________________
Don't make the same mistakes twice. Say NO to reincarnation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 09 Apr 2012 5:33 pm 
Offline
High King
User avatar

Joined: 26 Oct 2006 7:46 am
Posts: 2486
Location: Albion
Tertius wrote:
Je vois que vous vous resignez a admettre que vous etes trop cons pour verifier mes dires de vous-memes. Ca m'etonne un peu que vous l'admettiez, meme si indirectement. C'est une espece de progres, je suppose.


Progress indeed!
What a thrill to see, especially at this time of year to see that HE IS RISEN!!!!!
I'm sure we all remember that terrible day that the sky went black as poor ol' Roger finally gave up the ghost :cry:
Having fallen on his 'Crista'!
'Humbled for a season to receive a name' he was reduced to shouting from the shadows but now he's back in all his
majestic pomp!
Cue Hallelujah Chorus !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Abcgpn2UTV8

In the spirit of the season, naturally, I forgive your abuse once more!
There's just a few points to clear up:
Can you provide a reference for your alleged statement of fact?
Why waste all this time with the homage to Jacques Tati?
You will understand that, with your acknowledged misdirection on the Crista we probably not gonna be able to
take your word for it so some verifiable source would be nice. :wink:
BTW Were you consulted by de Wesselow for his new book on the Shroud ?

Joyeuse Pacques!

TD

_________________
" The evidence must be interrogated by minds trained in a discipline of attentive disbelief"
E. P. Thompson, 'The Poverty of Theory


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 09 Apr 2012 7:39 pm 
Offline
Emperor
User avatar

Joined: 13 Jan 2009 3:29 am
Posts: 7233
Location: Texas
Father Silence wrote:
lovuian wrote:
Father Silence wrote:

I may have stumbled on more Jesus had a twin evidence
It is at Notre Dame in Paris
a wood panel

Image
this photo is copyrighted to a friend of mine who allows me to use
If you notice the pillar with two children joined at the feet
Now some say Thomas is the twin ...but there is a group who think there was a sister twin

But the wood panels tend to indicate a Brother twin
for his is the Wedding of Cana panel at Notre Dame in Paris
Image
this photo copyrighted
What you see is Jesus sitting next to the bridegroom who has roses in his hair and the lady with a crown on her hair
dark complexion....the bridegroom is a Saint ...he has a halo....He looks like Jesus ...a family resemblance
The black servant points to the Mary with a veil and holds up the wine jar
It seems the Middle Ages may have known more about the Wedding at Cana than we do now. :wink: and that would mean the Crusading Knights including the Templars

There is an Medieval tradition that the bride and groom at the Wedding at Cana were John the Evangelist and Mary Magdalene. That would explain the halo on the man sitting next to Jesus (although he's admittedly a bit older and hairier that most depictions of John). The woman sitting next to Jesus is his mother. A servant is informing her about the wine.

The woman without the halo is Mary Magdalene. According to a story from the Golden Legend, John was called by Jesus to abandon his marriage before it was consummated. MM "had thereof indignation that her husband was taken from her, and went and gave herself to all delight, but because it was not convenable that the calling of Saint John should be occasion of her damnation, therefore our Lord converted her mercifully to penance, and because he had taken from her sovereign delight of the flesh, he replenished her with sovereign delight spiritual tofore all other, that is the love of God. And it is said that he ennobled Saint John tofore all other with the sweetness of his familiarity, because he had taken him from the delight aforesaid."

So it's possible she doesn't have a halo because she's not a saint yet.

Father Silence


the Rose bloodline ....Notre Dame is the center of Paris
the prime meridian when Paris was the center of the civilized world. Notre Dame marks the center of Paris, so it was as considered the center of the world, where longitude was defined as zero degrees.


The "Rose Line" is a 20th Century invention. The meridian was established some time after these figures were carved. To me it looks like the roses may be part of an old marriage ritual marking him as the groom.

The Bible tells us that Jesus has brothers and sisters
Jesus had "brothers and sisters", as reported in Mark
Matthew 13:55-56
The canonical Gospels name four brothers, James, Joseph (Joses), Judas and Simon, but only James is known to history, though some associate Simeon of Jerusalem with Simon the brother of Jesus. After Jesus' death, James, "the Lord's brother", was the head of the congregation in Jerusalem[2] and Jesus' relatives may have held positions of authority in the surrounding area.


This is one of those area where my Protestant upbringing puts me at a disadvantage, and it's a pretty murky subject, but here goes:

Some Catholics and others believe "Jude of James" and "Judas not called Iscariot" to be the same person as Jesus' brother of the same name. They interpret the phrase "Jude of James" as "Jude, brother of James". He his also believed to be the same as disciple Thaddeus, who appears in some lists where Jude doesn't. He's also considered by the Catholic Encyclopedia as identical with Simon the Zealot. He is listed as the 2nd Bishop of Jerusalem.

The author of the Epistle of Jude refers to himself as the brother (adelphos) of James.

Hegesippus (quoted by Eusebius) tells of the persecution and martyr of Jude's children.

Speaking of Eusebius: his version of the "Image of Edessa" story refers to "Judas also called Thomas". Other versions of this story (including the Golden Legend's) cast Jude as a companion of Thomas who sends him to Edessa.

Some early Syriac bibles refer to an apostle called Jude Thomas.

The Acts of Thomas, which most scholars think was originally from a Syriac text, clearly identifies Thomas as the twin brother of Jesus. as does the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas.

There is the presentation of Jesus ....he is placed on a pillar
and the Pillar has a plaid on it plaids to the Scots and Irish indicate their family.

Are you sure? Looks like horizontal stripes to me, with some staining on the gold bits. Anyway it looks like the polychrome (which is the same stuff we used to call "paint") is a lot newer than the carving.

lovuian wrote:
...there is a girl with Mary and is that Joseph? he is a saint.


Like a lot of Medieval "Presentations" this looks more like a Catholic christening than any Jewish ceremony. The male figure is Simeon, who is frequently shown in Medieval art as a priest. The female behind Mary is the prophetess Anne, who is mentioned in Luke. The artist forgets she's supposed to e elderly.


lovuian wrote:
...it is the Pillar with the golden children joined at the foot in the same story that is interesting
is it a reference to twins ...Gemini and to Jacob and Esau
Thomas the Apostle or "Didymus", both names meaning "twin" in Aramaic and Greek respectively, is the most well-known Didymus due to his role in early Christian history
The Greek Didymus : in the Gospel of John


The two dancing children appear to be a sculpture in a niche of the temple. I assume that's why they're on a pedestal and appear to be on a rectangular base. I see two possibilities:

a) A lot of Western Christian artists imagined the Jewish Temple to be filled with statues and icons, like a pagan temple or Catholic church, so this may just be a random bit of architectural "background".

b] This may be an extremely inaccurate representation of the Arc of the Covenant as a small box with 2 seraphim on the lid, mounted on a pedestal.

And, yes, the Golden Legend is important if you want to know "what people believed". Many medieval Christians were more familiar with the Legend than with the Bible.


Father Silence[/quote]

lovuian wrote:
Thanks for your thoughts on the wood panels
but then you must see ALL of the panels to get the flow of the artist

Look at the bridegroom and what he looks like and think of your interpretation of it being John ...the young John
and then look at the Last Supper

Image

The Medieval idea of the Holy Grail ...the golden cup which Christ drinks from at the Last Supper
but look at the suppose John...he is feminine now looking with golden reddish hair...joined hands with Jesus over the golden cup

I would argue that the Saint who sits at the table with Jesus is not the one who holds Jesus hand and he holds this Apostles hand ....if it was the they would look the same

this Apostle does not have a halo similar to the rest ....this Apostle is connected to the Golden Cup and closest to Jesus even over Peter

Father Silence
I'd be interested in your ideas


Thank you for posting this. The figure swooning on Jesus bosom is supposed to be John, but I'm not sure how he could have a halo without obscuring a big part of Jesus' face. I think we may be looking at the work of more than one artist working as a team. Notice how Jesus looks kind of like a Klingon in the Cana panel but in the Last Supper his hair is a lighter color, his hairstyle is different and his face more elongated. Some of the differences may also be the result of overpainting.

FS[/quote]

Your Welcome and thanks for your interest



This is Chartres stained glass window of that Last Supper
http://www.sacred-destinations.com/france/chartres-cathedral-stained-glass-photos/slides/w03_7599c-last-supper.jpg
it dates back to the 1100's
Here to the Golden Chalice is there


Chretien de Troyes

The Grail is first featured in Perceval, le Conte du Graal (The Story of the Grail) by Chretien de Troyes, who claims he was working from a source book given to him by his patron, Count Philip of Flanders. In this incomplete poem, dated sometime between 1180 and 1191, the object has not yet acquired the implications of holiness it would have in later works. While dining in the magical abode of the Fisher King, Perceval witnesses a wondrous procession in which youths carry magnificent objects from one chamber to another, passing before him at each course of the meal. First comes a young man carrying a bleeding lance, then two boys carrying candelabras. Finally, a beautiful young girl emerges bearing an elaborately decorated graal, or grail.

Chretien refers to his object not as The Grail but as un graal, showing the word was used, in its earliest literary context, as a common noun. For Chretien the grail was a wide, somewhat deep dish or bowl, interesting because it contained not a pike, salmon or lamprey, as the audience may have expected for such a container, but a single Mass wafer which provided sustenance for the Fisher King's crippled father.

Perceval, who had been warned against talking too much, remains silent through all of this, and wakes up the next morning alone. He later learns that if he had asked the appropriate questions about what he saw, he would have healed his maimed host, much to his honor.

Though Chretien's account is the earliest and most influential of all Grail texts, it was in the work of Robert de Boron that the Grail truly became the Holy Grail and assumed the form most familiar to modern readers. In his verse romance Joseph d'Arimathie, composed between 1191 and 1202, Robert tells the story of Joseph of Arimathea acquiring the chalice of the Last Supper to collect Christ's blood upon His removal from the cross. Joseph is thrown in prison where Christ visits him and explains the mysteries of the blessed cup. Upon his release Joseph gathers his in-laws and other followers and travels to the west, and founds a dynasty of Grail keepers that eventually includes Perceval.

_________________
Everything is Connected and there are no
coincidences


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 09 Apr 2012 7:46 pm 
Offline
Grand Master
User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2011 12:02 pm
Posts: 1451
Tertius wrote:
Je vois que vous vous resignez a admettre que vous etes trop cons pour verifier mes dires de vous-memes. Ca m'etonne un peu que vous l'admettiez, meme si indirectement. C'est une espece de progres, je suppose.



Roger,

Why should we bother checking anything you write?

We know you are close to the Vatican but are you close enough that you enjoy papal infallibility.

Until you can establish some credibility, I see no point chasing your rabbits down your burrows.

_________________
"That historical explanation cannot deal in absolutes and cannot adduce sufficient causes greatly irritates some simple and impatient souls"
E. P. Thompson, The Poverty of Theory


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 09 Apr 2012 8:05 pm 
Offline
Grand Master

Joined: 12 Sep 2011 11:17 pm
Posts: 412
Bienheureux les simples d'esprit, ils seront les premiers au Royaume des Cieux.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 09 Apr 2012 8:10 pm 
Offline
Grand Master
User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2011 12:02 pm
Posts: 1451
Tertius wrote:
Bienheureux les simples d'esprit, ils seront les premiers au Royaume des Cieux.


Perhaps we should consider all of the Beatitudes:

the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
they that mourn: for they shall be comforted.
the meek: for they shall inherit the earth.
they which do hunger and thirst after righteousness: for they shall be filled.
the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy.
the pure in heart: for they shall see God.
the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.


Unfortunately, I see no hope for you.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
"That historical explanation cannot deal in absolutes and cannot adduce sufficient causes greatly irritates some simple and impatient souls"
E. P. Thompson, The Poverty of Theory


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 09 Apr 2012 8:11 pm 
Offline
Grand Master

Joined: 12 Sep 2011 11:17 pm
Posts: 412
Les cons osent tout. C'est meme a cela qu'on les reconnait. (Michel Audiard)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 09 Apr 2012 8:25 pm 
Offline
Grand Master
User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2011 12:02 pm
Posts: 1451
Tertius wrote:
Les cons osent tout. C'est meme a cela qu'on les reconnait. (Michel Audiard)

Tiens, vous avez sorti le vitriol ?(Michel Audiard)

_________________
"That historical explanation cannot deal in absolutes and cannot adduce sufficient causes greatly irritates some simple and impatient souls"
E. P. Thompson, The Poverty of Theory


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 10 Apr 2012 11:31 am 
Offline
High King
User avatar

Joined: 04 Dec 2008 7:15 pm
Posts: 2060
Location: Vienna, Austria
Tertius wrote:
Bienheureux les simples d'esprit, ils seront les premiers au Royaume des Cieux.

Selig die Einfachen im Geiste, denn ihrer ist das Himmelreich.

(we've got that too)

Lang lebe Sarkasmus, Spott und Ironie. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 10 Apr 2012 7:53 pm 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 8976
Location: Los Angeles
Shasta wrote:
I am not familiar with that particular author, although several books have been writing espousing that same theory. The original idea that Jesus and Thomas were twins began with King Gondopharnes...Jesus and Thomas were at his palace in Taxila attending the wedding of Megavahana, and they look and dressed so much alike that the king mistook one for the other. That's how the theory got started 2,000 years ago....the records survived..There are several bone fragment relics of Thomas that have survived to this day.....That would be a wonderful contribution to the DNA profiles. There are also several fragments purportedly from Magdalene...I wonder if they would yield DNA? That would be interesting!


An even more interesting, and likely more probable result might be that every sample taken and tested would yield a different result. I doubt very seriously that relic merchants a millennium ago could envision a day when man would have the capability of analyzing DNA, thus making certain that all body parts tagged as coming from one saint all came off of the same cadaver.

Shasta wrote:
I wish I had kept my cool a little better in my previous posts on this thread. One of the key points to my jumping on the "Merovingian" bloodline and touting it was because the tomb was/is in imminent danger of being totally destroyed...this was already underway in small pieces so as not to arouse sudden public outcry..It then became imperative to emphasize that I might be a relative and had the right to speak up for the protection of the tomb.. it is all so much more complicated than appears on the surface. ...but that was the only course of action left, and it did work, at least for a short while.


I'm still dying to hear how you managed to convince whatever authorities needed convincing in order to grant you access that a "Merovingian bloodline" qualified you as the corpse's relative.

Shasta wrote:
Regardless who may be in that tomb, even if there is just one chance in a million, or one in a billion that it has any connection with Jesus, then at the very least, the DNA should be retrieved for historians...the rest will work out from there...regardless what theory you adhere to, get the DNA !!! Once these graves are gone, we are in the dark forever.


Regardless what "theory" one adheres to? I'd be fascinated to hear some of the others! :lol:

Shasta wrote:
I wish ten thousand people would descend upon Roza Bal claiming to be descendants! That at least might save this ancient grave...Perhaps we can get a few dozen volunteers from this forum! :-)


Wouldn't surprise me in the least, I could name a few off the top of my head...

TCP


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 10 Apr 2012 9:31 pm 
Offline
Grand Master
User avatar

Joined: 19 Nov 2008 11:01 am
Posts: 1702
Nice to see you back TCP....I was worried about you.


I will skip quickly over the points you emphasized because the details can be found everywhere...online and in my book.

Quote:
I'm still dying to hear how you managed to convince whatever authorities needed convincing in order to grant you access that a "Merovingian bloodline" qualified you as the corpse's relative.


I showed them books like "Bloodline of the Holy Grail" "Jesus Lived in India" "Jesus Died in India" "The Fifth Gospel" and others...
It had already been a topic well covered by others....


About Roza Bal and relatives of Jesus-Merovingian or otherwise, the family of Bashrat Shaheen claimed they were descendents of Yuz Asaf, whom they swear documentation supports was Jesus....and so local authorities needed very little to be open to the idea that some descendents extended beyond the borders of India.....

Roza Bal tomb was seized by fundamentalists who were destroying the tomb in accordance with policy that came out of Saudi Arabia, and the royal family's Wahab, Salafi beliefs..which they are exporting worldwide with petrol dollars...Taliban and Muslim Brotherhood are a good example of what they support, what their ideologies are. Many tombs have already been destroyed...look up the destruction of the tomb of Joseph the Patriarch for example...

They could not say for sure that I was a descendent....or wasn't. That would have to wait for the DNA (through my brother of course)....but at least it did stall the destruction of the tomb and drew the attention of local authorities...who are now watching more closely....

I quite agree that "if" DNA could be obtained from any of the surviving bone fragments, they could be anybody....the point for the moment is not to insist that this is "Magdalene" DNA, or this is "Thomas" DNA....the point is to get as much as possible and just allow things to be built up into DNA profiles....It will take years for sure....but one day these old graves will cease to yield any DNA...and perhaps knowing will help sort out history and complex family relationships.....as you pointed out TCP....you may be related to many of them as well.......and perhaps a few relationships you didn't realize you had in your family tree! I have a Japanese great great (on so on) grandmother...from the Anu tribe....Japanese? Geesh. Where did SHE come from?

The point of my book, made in the first chapter and in the last chapter, was to ask why do we care at all? Why did my grandmother tend the old family graves? The former King of South Korea visited the memorial to his ancestor from India.....she was sent to Korea during the era of Jesus at age 15 to marry the king there...Their ten children produced a line that proudly claim their descent to this day......so interest in "Jesus" or any other 2,000 year old bloodlines are not unique to the world....it is in response to a longing to know and to connect with our past. I dont know why. I asked why in my book. Even elephants will remember their dead and "mourn" over their bones...It is an emotional response programmed in to higher cognitive states...You can find it around the world....It doesn't matter who is buried in Roza Bal tomb....it matters to know the truth about him, and us, whatever that truth may prove to be...

NIce to see you back.....Hope you are well....

Shasta.

_________________
Don't make the same mistakes twice. Say NO to reincarnation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 11 Apr 2012 12:41 am 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 8976
Location: Los Angeles
Shasta wrote:
tcp wrote:
I'm still dying to hear how you managed to convince whatever authorities needed convincing in order to grant you access that a "Merovingian bloodline" qualified you as the corpse's relative.


I showed them books like "Bloodline of the Holy Grail" "Jesus Lived in India" "Jesus Died in India" "The Fifth Gospel" and others...
It had already been a topic well covered by others....

<...>

They could not say for sure that I was a descendent....or wasn't. That would have to wait for the DNA (through my brother of course)....but at least it did stall the destruction of the tomb and drew the attention of local authorities...who are now watching more closely....


And so once these local authorities had your brother's DNA signature, what did they compare it to in order to satisfy the kinship requirement and grant you access to the tomb?

Shasta wrote:
I quite agree that "if" DNA could be obtained from any of the surviving bone fragments, they could be anybody....the point for the moment is not to insist that this is "Magdalene" DNA, or this is "Thomas" DNA....the point is to get as much as possible and just allow things to be built up into DNA profiles....It will take years for sure....but one day these old graves will cease to yield any DNA...and perhaps knowing will help sort out history and complex family relationships.....


The one thing DNA can't reveal by itself are complex relationships. People are led to believe (or wish to believe) that DNA signatures are as unique as fingerprints. Not true. If one were to run Y-DNA tests on myself and various direct male-line relatives of mine going back ten or fifteen generations, the best that could be determined would be which among the samples are most and least closely related (revealed through mutations). No one would be able to ascertain relationships, merely distinct lines of descent from a common ancestral group that developed roughly 10,000 to 40,000 years ago. In order to piece together those relationships one would need records. Adding random results to a DNA database isn't going to make anything clearer. A match could mean direct descent, descent from a contemporary relative within X number of generations (depending on the degree of genetic variance), or descent from a common ancestor tens of thousands of years ago. Given the number of generations that must stand between Yuz Asaf and your friends (90 to 100 easily) there would be no way for DNA to reveal whether they descend from him. Now, armed with very good documentation (which you say they have) a positive DNA link could bolster their claims, though not prove them. The only thing DNA could prove definitively is that they're not related at all, everything else is speculative, and more and more so the further further back the generations go.

TCP


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 11 Apr 2012 12:54 am 
Offline
Grand Master
User avatar

Joined: 19 Nov 2008 11:01 am
Posts: 1702
Yes, TCP..... I do agree that in some ways, DNA will be a vague historical connection....
However, the emphasis here is on collecting the DNA from these old sites...

Before this happens to all of them:

http://www.wnd.com/2008/02/56238/

The Shroud of Turin may one day be re-examined, and the hope of course is that DNA can be obtained from one of the actual "blood" stains on the Shroud......Now, if we had that DNA, plus the DNA from Yuz Asaf, plus the DNA from the Biblical patriarch Abraham, hopefully still undisturbed in Machpelah......http://www.khouse.org/articles/1997/13/ then through such processes of checks and cross-checks, we can determine the truth behind some of the legends and assumptions....

It is worth the effort, TCP.....it really is.....I believe that with all my heart, because I know most of these sites are in imminent danger of being destroyed forever.....Perhaps we cannot expect to save the grave of Abraham forever...but I hope at least their DNA can be salvaged for history...

Shasta

_________________
Don't make the same mistakes twice. Say NO to reincarnation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 11 Apr 2012 1:20 am 
Offline
High King
User avatar

Joined: 22 Jun 2009 10:28 pm
Posts: 4247
Location: NA
Shasta wrote:
It is worth the effort, TCP.....it really is.....I believe that with all my heart, because I know most of these sites are in imminent danger of being destroyed forever.....Perhaps we cannot expect to save the grave of Abraham forever...but I hope at least their DNA can be salvaged for history...

Shasta


You can do that without revising religio-historical context, surely. All you seem to be doing is trading on a highly politicised-religious state of affairs to redefine history which is not unusual or unique it's just not the right way to do things to provide true scientific records for posterity. It doesn't contribute to mankind's knowledge and it most certainly sounds machivellian in that you're trying to say "the ends justify the means" if I interpret your reasoning correctly.

_________________
************


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 11 Apr 2012 2:14 am 
Offline
Grand Master
User avatar

Joined: 19 Nov 2008 11:01 am
Posts: 1702
ooops

_________________
Don't make the same mistakes twice. Say NO to reincarnation.


Last edited by Shasta on 11 Apr 2012 2:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 11 Apr 2012 2:18 am 
Offline
Grand Master
User avatar

Joined: 19 Nov 2008 11:01 am
Posts: 1702
@Rain.....I perhaps did not make my point clearly enough, according to what you are reading into this..

Quote:
it's just not the right way to do things to provide true scientific records for posterity.


Really? What could be more scientific than DNA?

The ancient graves will not last forever..the concern is to get as much DNA as possible...rewrite history?
Perhaps. The DNA of the Egyptian King Tut established that he was Celtic.....surely that raises some historical questions..."Not the right way to gather historical evidence?" Hmmmm why not? It is but one of many tools available to modern historians...
And there is nothing Machiavellian about it!

Perhaps you know the story about Anastasia and Anna Anderson? It was only DNA that could establish the truth.....how many false claimants can we recall from the past thirty years? At least DNA offers some deterrent to many of these false claimants..

_________________
Don't make the same mistakes twice. Say NO to reincarnation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 11 Apr 2012 2:29 am 
Offline
High King
User avatar

Joined: 22 Jun 2009 10:28 pm
Posts: 4247
Location: NA
Shasta wrote:
@Rain.....I perhaps did not make my point clearly enough, according to what you are reading into this..
The ancient graves will not last forever..the concern is to get as much DNA as possible...rewrite history?
Perhaps. The DNA of the Egyptian King Tut established that he was Celtic.....surely that raises some historical questions..."Not the right way to gather historical evidence?" Hmmmm why not? It is but one of many tools available to modern historians...
And there is nothing Machiavellian about it!

Perhaps you know the story about Anastasia and Anna Anderson? It was only DNA that could establish the truth.....how many false claimants can we recall from the past thirty years? At least DNA offers some deterrent to many of these false claimants..


Suggesting ten of thousands of people or even half a dozen from this forum should invade the Kashmir region to collect DNA from a localised religious tomb is quite frankly bizarre even as a half-joke.
One of the most disputed regions in the world that has nuclear weapons targeted on it and you think collecting DNA to prove your messianic lineage is somehow a rational or plausible reason to do it. It just leaves me lost for words really....

And Machiavelli was a brilliant tactician whether or not you agreed with the tatics morally or not.

_________________
************


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 11 Apr 2012 4:58 am 
Offline
Grand Master
User avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2010 7:47 pm
Posts: 659
Location: Houston TX
Father Silence wrote:
lovuian wrote:
Thanks for your thoughts on the wood panels
but then you must see ALL of the panels to get the flow of the artist

Look at the bridegroom and what he looks like and think of your interpretation of it being John ...the young John
and then look at the Last Supper

Image

The Medieval idea of the Holy Grail ...the golden cup which Christ drinks from at the Last Supper
but look at the suppose John...he is feminine now looking with golden reddish hair...joined hands with Jesus over the golden cup

I would argue that the Saint who sits at the table with Jesus is not the one who holds Jesus hand and he holds this Apostles hand ....if it was the they would look the same

this Apostle does not have a halo similar to the rest ....this Apostle is connected to the Golden Cup and closest to Jesus even over Peter

Father Silence
I'd be interested in your ideas


Thank you for posting this. The figure swooning on Jesus bosom is supposed to be John, but I'm not sure how he could have a halo without obscuring a big part of Jesus' face. I think we may be looking at the work of more than one artist working as a team. Notice how Jesus looks kind of like a Klingon in the Cana panel but in the Last Supper his hair is a lighter color, his hairstyle is different and his face more elongated. Some of the differences may also be the result of overpainting.

FS


lovuian wrote:
Your Welcome and thanks for your interest


lov,

In this Last Supper Judas has a halo. Did you notice? I think this probably indicates that the person who painted the halos didn't do the carving. Another reason the Beloved Disciple didn't get one (IMO) is that the halos aren't 3d but only painted on the "back wall" of every scene, since John isn't near the back wall he does without. I am happy to listen to other explanations.

Also I'm not seeing the "joined hands" thing you describe. It looks to me like Jesus has his right hand raised in benediction, BD has his hand over the chalice (or on Jesus' tummy). I can't see Jesus' left hand. The picture gets a little blurry when I blow it up so maybe I'm missing something.

I'm wondering how old these panels actually are. Does your photographer friend know anything of their history?

I have suspicions they are, compared to the cathedral itself, relatively new.

I think this Last Supper was created by someone familiar with Leonardo's. One of Leonardo's innovations was to create action by giving each disciples individual gestures of frustration, confusion, etc. I seems to me this artist is attempting to do the same thing but is limited by the medium. Judas is seated on the same side of the table with the others as in the Leonardo. And look at all those sandals. There's even a little door at the bottom (although that may be just part of the cathedral's trim).

If this is correct the wood relief can't be older than 1498.

Also, the servant in the Cana panel is black. African servants don't become stock characters in European paintings 'till the 1600s or thereabouts.

In the 1790s the interior of Notre Dame de Paris was damaged by thieves and vandals representing the Cult of Reason. NDP underwent a major
restoration in the 1850s and I'm wondering if any of these panels may have been repaired, replaced or repainted at that time.

FS

_________________
“If there's anything on this ship more important than my ego, I want it caught and shot right now” ~ Zaphod Beeblebrox


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 11 Apr 2012 5:51 am 
Offline
Emperor
User avatar

Joined: 13 Jan 2009 3:29 am
Posts: 7233
Location: Texas
Father Silence wrote:
Father Silence wrote:
lovuian wrote:
Thanks for your thoughts on the wood panels
but then you must see ALL of the panels to get the flow of the artist

Look at the bridegroom and what he looks like and think of your interpretation of it being John ...the young John
and then look at the Last Supper

Image

The Medieval idea of the Holy Grail ...the golden cup which Christ drinks from at the Last Supper
but look at the suppose John...he is feminine now looking with golden reddish hair...joined hands with Jesus over the golden cup

I would argue that the Saint who sits at the table with Jesus is not the one who holds Jesus hand and he holds this Apostles hand ....if it was the they would look the same

this Apostle does not have a halo similar to the rest ....this Apostle is connected to the Golden Cup and closest to Jesus even over Peter

Father Silence
I'd be interested in your ideas


Thank you for posting this. The figure swooning on Jesus bosom is supposed to be John, but I'm not sure how he could have a halo without obscuring a big part of Jesus' face. I think we may be looking at the work of more than one artist working as a team. Notice how Jesus looks kind of like a Klingon in the Cana panel but in the Last Supper his hair is a lighter color, his hairstyle is different and his face more elongated. Some of the differences may also be the result of overpainting.

FS


lovuian wrote:
Your Welcome and thanks for your interest


lov,

In this Last Supper Judas has a halo. Did you notice? I think this probably indicates that the person who painted the halos didn't do the carving. Another reason the Beloved Disciple didn't get one (IMO) is that the halos aren't 3d but only painted on the "back wall" of every scene, since John isn't near the back wall he does without. I am happy to listen to other explanations.

Also I'm not seeing the "joined hands" thing you describe. It looks to me like Jesus has his right hand raised in benediction, BD has his hand over the chalice (or on Jesus' tummy). I can't see Jesus' left hand. The picture gets a little blurry when I blow it up so maybe I'm missing something.

I'm wondering how old these panels actually are. Does your photographer friend know anything of their history?

I have suspicions they are, compared to the cathedral itself, relatively new.

I think this Last Supper was created by someone familiar with Leonardo's. One of Leonardo's innovations was to create action by giving each disciples individual gestures of frustration, confusion, etc. I seems to me this artist is attempting to do the same thing but is limited by the medium. Judas is seated on the same side of the table with the others as in the Leonardo. And look at all those sandals. There's even a little door at the bottom (although that may be just part of the cathedral's trim).

If this is correct the wood relief can't be older than 1498.

Also, the servant in the Cana panel is black. African servants don't become stock characters in European paintings 'till the 1600s or thereabouts.

In the 1790s the interior of Notre Dame de Paris was damaged by thieves and vandals representing the Cult of Reason. NDP underwent a major
restoration in the 1850s and I'm wondering if any of these panels may have been repaired, replaced or repainted at that time.

FS


Well great observation Father Silence that Judas has a halo
you believe that this is an error by the artist ? I find that hard to believe
Perhaps the Artist thought Judas was a Saint? You know there is the Gospel of Judas
The Gospel of Judas consists of 16 chapters which document Jesus's teaching about spiritual matters and cosmology. Judas is the hero of this Gospel and the only one of Jesus's disciples who accurately understands the words of his master.
It is a fascinating wood panel and I don't know how old it is
And I would love to hear if you find out

The legend of the Holy Grail was known in the 1700's and it is interesting you compare it to Da Vinci because he died in France so the painter maybe influenced
ahh yes you saw the Red door and notice the trim looking like a castle tower

Any way kinda fascinating huh



A red door provides protection. In Biblical times, the Hebrew slaves were instructed to smear blood of a lamb on their front doors to protect their first born from the angel of death. In old Catholicism churches painted the doors of the church red to represent the blood of Christ. Passing through the door would mean that you were on holy ground. Some believe a red door protects the occupants from evil.

_________________
Everything is Connected and there are no
coincidences


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 11 Apr 2012 5:54 am 
Offline
Grand Master
User avatar

Joined: 19 Nov 2008 11:01 am
Posts: 1702
@ Rain.....
Quote:
Suggesting ten of thousands of people or even half a dozen from this forum should invade the Kashmir region to collect DNA from a localized religious tomb is quite frankly bizarre even as a half-joke.


I never suggested that ten thousand or a thousand or a hundred people invade Kashmir....Why are you twisting my words to suit your own agenda? Geesh. Further, "It is not a "localized religious tomb"....

"definition of or relating to Machiavelli or Machiavellianism;suggesting the principles of conduct laid down by Machiavelli; specifically : marked by cunning, duplicity, or bad faith ."


I am sorry you feel that way about me and Machiavelli...or that I am on some kind of "messianic mission".....Perhaps one day you will actually read my book and have a very different impression.

Since you are at a loss for words anyway, please dont respond.. Thank You.

_________________
Don't make the same mistakes twice. Say NO to reincarnation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 11 Apr 2012 6:03 am 
Offline
Grand Master
User avatar

Joined: 15 Oct 2010 7:47 pm
Posts: 659
Location: Houston TX
lovuian wrote:
Father Silence wrote:
Father Silence wrote:
Thanks for your thoughts on the wood panels
but then you must see ALL of the panels to get the flow of the artist

Look at the bridegroom and what he looks like and think of your interpretation of it being John ...the young John
and then look at the Last Supper

Image

The Medieval idea of the Holy Grail ...the golden cup which Christ drinks from at the Last Supper
but look at the suppose John...he is feminine now looking with golden reddish hair...joined hands with Jesus over the golden cup

I would argue that the Saint who sits at the table with Jesus is not the one who holds Jesus hand and he holds this Apostles hand ....if it was the they would look the same

this Apostle does not have a halo similar to the rest ....this Apostle is connected to the Golden Cup and closest to Jesus even over Peter

Father Silence
I'd be interested in your ideas


Thank you for posting this. The figure swooning on Jesus bosom is supposed to be John, but I'm not sure how he could have a halo without obscuring a big part of Jesus' face. I think we may be looking at the work of more than one artist working as a team. Notice how Jesus looks kind of like a Klingon in the Cana panel but in the Last Supper his hair is a lighter color, his hairstyle is different and his face more elongated. Some of the differences may also be the result of overpainting.

FS


lovuian wrote:
Your Welcome and thanks for your interest


lov,

In this Last Supper Judas has a halo. Did you notice? I think this probably indicates that the person who painted the halos didn't do the carving. Another reason the Beloved Disciple didn't get one (IMO) is that the halos aren't 3d but only painted on the "back wall" of every scene, since John isn't near the back wall he does without. I am happy to listen to other explanations.

Also I'm not seeing the "joined hands" thing you describe. It looks to me like Jesus has his right hand raised in benediction, BD has his hand over the chalice (or on Jesus' tummy). I can't see Jesus' left hand. The picture gets a little blurry when I blow it up so maybe I'm missing something.

I'm wondering how old these panels actually are. Does your photographer friend know anything of their history?

I have suspicions they are, compared to the cathedral itself, relatively new.

I think this Last Supper was created by someone familiar with Leonardo's. One of Leonardo's innovations was to create action by giving each disciples individual gestures of frustration, confusion, etc. I seems to me this artist is attempting to do the same thing but is limited by the medium. Judas is seated on the same side of the table with the others as in the Leonardo. And look at all those sandals. There's even a little door at the bottom (although that may be just part of the cathedral's trim).

If this is correct the wood relief can't be older than 1498.

Also, the servant in the Cana panel is black. African servants don't become stock characters in European paintings 'till the 1600s or thereabouts.

In the 1790s the interior of Notre Dame de Paris was damaged by thieves and vandals representing the Cult of Reason. NDP underwent a major
restoration in the 1850s and I'm wondering if any of these panels may have been repaired, replaced or repainted at that time.

FS


lovuian wrote:
Well great observation Father Silence that Judas has a halo
you believe that this is an error by the artist ? I find that hard to believe
Perhaps the Artist thought Judas was a Saint? You know there is the Gospel of Judas
The Gospel of Judas consists of 16 chapters which document Jesus's teaching about spiritual matters and cosmology. Judas is the hero of this Gospel and the only one of Jesus's disciples who accurately understands the words of his master.
It is a fascinating wood panel and I don't know how old it is
And I would love to hear if you find out

The legend of the Holy Grail was known in the 1700's and it is interesting you compare it to Da Vinci because he died in France so the painter maybe influenced
ahh yes you saw the Red door and notice the trim looking like a castle tower

Any way kinda fascinating huh



A red door provides protection. In Biblical times, the Hebrew slaves were instructed to smear blood of a lamb on their front doors to protect their first born from the angel of death. In old Catholicism churches painted the doors of the church red to represent the blood of Christ. Passing through the door would mean that you were on holy ground. Some believe a red door protects the occupants from evil.


I was more impressed by its location than its color. Reminds me of the door cut into the lower part of Leonardo's mural.

FS

_________________
“If there's anything on this ship more important than my ego, I want it caught and shot right now” ~ Zaphod Beeblebrox


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 11 Apr 2012 6:34 am 
Offline
High King
User avatar

Joined: 22 Jun 2009 10:28 pm
Posts: 4247
Location: NA
Shasta wrote:
@ Rain.....
Quote:
Suggesting ten of thousands of people or even half a dozen from this forum should invade the Kashmir region to collect DNA from a localized religious tomb is quite frankly bizarre even as a half-joke.


I never suggested that ten thousand or a thousand or a hundred people invade Kashmir....Why are you twisting my words to suit your own agenda? Geesh. Further, "It is not a "localized religious tomb"....


"definition of or relating to Machiavelli or Machiavellianism;suggesting the principles of conduct laid down by Machiavelli; specifically : marked by cunning, duplicity, or bad faith ."


I am sorry you feel that way about me and Machiavelli...or that I am on some kind of "messianic mission".....Perhaps one day you will actually read my book and have a very different impression.

Since you are at a loss for words anyway, please dont respond.. Thank You.


Sorry you forgot what you said. Let me remind you.

Quote:
Shasta wrote:
I wish ten thousand people would descend upon Roza Bal claiming to be descendants! That at least might save this ancient grave...Perhaps we can get a few dozen volunteers from this forum!



As for responding - no need TCP has is doing well in the DNA argument and logic and I would have to say we're coming down to the Old Great Westerner trying to save the natives argument and frankly I find that level of condescension demeaning for the Kashmirian people that you suggest don't know how to keep their history.

If you really care contact UNESCO. The following link - you should know them - they're familiar with accords that you need to abide by so you wouldn't be seen to be "Lara Crofting."

http://www.unesco.org/new/en/

Quote:
Perhaps one day you will actually read my book and have a very different impression.


I'm sure you're a good storyteller by the reactions on Amazon - although you have been critisced for not having an editor. I would say you're using this forum to plug the holes and provide that service for you, wouldn't you. As TCP suggested this is probably closest to the only peer review you'll get. You've probably stymied every other competing party. :roll:

Been there, seen that you're not descended from the Christian "Son of God" and if you truly believe it - flash that birthmark and identify yourself. :lol: (That's a joke by the way from HBHG)

_________________
************


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 11 Apr 2012 6:39 am 
Offline
Grand Master
User avatar

Joined: 19 Nov 2008 11:01 am
Posts: 1702
No Rain, I am not at this forum to "plug holes" or whatever.....I was a member of this forum since many years ago..
and have some old friends here I enjoy chatting with....

I have already suggested that anyone interested in my book or this theory can join another forum on Facebook where this is the main topic.....

Quote:
"we're coming down to the Old Great Westerner trying to save the natives argument and frankly I find that level of condescension demeaning for the Kashmirian people that you suggest don't know how to keep their history."


No Rain, again you missed the point....had you read the book, you would understand that I lived in the region during the Afghan War and saw a lot of cultural terrorism. Blowing up the Bamiyan Buddha was but one example...Where was UNESCO then? Who was keeping the regions history then? The same situations still exist.

Quote:
"Been there, seen that you're not descended from the Christian "Son of God" and if you truly believe it - flash that birthmark and identify yourself."


I asked again and again in my book who is Yuz Asaf. It may one day be determined that he is/was a mere caretaker who got swept up into historical errors...As Tim pointed out, if just one is descended from Jesus Christ, or Clovis and Clothilde, then there may be millions of descendents in the world today.....It's all about the DNA. Nothing else.

Have a nice day/night whatever....

_________________
Don't make the same mistakes twice. Say NO to reincarnation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 11 Apr 2012 7:01 am 
Offline
High King
User avatar

Joined: 22 Jun 2009 10:28 pm
Posts: 4247
Location: NA
Shasta wrote:
No Rain, again you missed the point....had you read the book, you would understand that I lived in the region during the Afghan War and saw a lot of cultural terrorism. Blowing up the Bamiyan Buddha was but one example...Where was UNESCO then? Who was keeping the regions history then? The same situations still exist.


Maybe you missed the point... Bhuddists weren't upset about the "pile of rocks being blown up" they don't worship idols... they focus on the underlying notion of compassion encapusulated by the Bhuddha.
There was only sadness and compassion that in the hearts of these people was such hate and violence that manifested in that act.
True Bhuddism does not desire the material. Maybe you should try and understand that aspect of the culture.

_________________
************


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Maguelonne
PostPosted: 11 Apr 2012 7:05 am 
Offline
Grand Master
User avatar

Joined: 19 Nov 2008 11:01 am
Posts: 1702
Oh MY....You are going to teach me Buddhism now?
Are you aware the Buddhists have begun raising the money to restore the Bamiyan Buddha?
And one need only have lived in Buddhist countries, as I have, like Thailand (for 3 years)
to know that there are as many statues and figures in a Buddhist Watt as in any Cathedral in Paris.

There is an entire chapter of my book devoted to Buddhism and its connections with Christianity...had you read the book you could have avoided making uneducated and uniformed guesses about where I am "coming from"...

The whole world was upset about the destruction of the Bamiyan Buddas...it's the whole point of my book....
how do we save these historical sites? Whose responsibility is it? A Family? A Government? A world organization?

Since we see no hope for one another.....why do you want to keep making antagonistic posts? Especially since you haven't even read the book?

Oh well.........I'm sure you're a very nice person....

_________________
Don't make the same mistakes twice. Say NO to reincarnation.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 929 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ... 38  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group