I will tell Ben that if he presents me with objectively certifiable evidence of his tomb, I will rectify my criticism with all the publishing might I can mobilize and become his greatest fan.
Can i ask you something?
Im not being funny or anything, and i kinda like you but:
1) Why would you be on top of Ben's list to 'supply certifiable evidence' to, after what you and your friends did via your website and the phone call?
Me and what friends? I don't need to be anywhere on anybody's list.
2) Why does Ben have to justify anything to such researchers - most of whom seem to deal in fakery and misleading/misrepresentation themselves, or rub shoulders with such people?
Ben has no obligation to justify anything to anyone and I am not claiming so anywhere. It's complety up to him what he says where about what. Only thing is that if you claim a spectacular find people will ask you for proof and if you fail to be convincing, they will draw their conclusions.
And btw - it wasnt Ben who said the filmed Loch Ness was 'something'. According to Ben, it was the investigators at the Loch Ness place who called together a meeting of 7 people to decide whether it was something to look into or not. Of that 7, one person didnt think it was anything.
Ben left the tape with them - he effectively gave it to them - and about a week later they contacted him and said they didnt think it was anything after all. End of.
And tell me, how does videoing something in the Loch Ness prove that the tomb in the Aude valley isnt real?
With the information that I have (and I haven't published and won't publish everything here) I know enough about the facts and motives to be sure for myself that Ben was willingly trying to sell a hoax to the LNP in 1999. That, in combination with what my contacts in DRAC have told me about his 'Tomb', combined with the obvious flaws in the presented 'clues' make me 100% sure that this was a pattern repeating. That's a personal opinion that I won't forcefeed to anyone. Everyone should believe what they want.
How about not treating Ben like he has been convicted by a gaggle of RLC jurors
I literally said in this thread that I reject his forgeries, not the man and the good stuff that he does.
I want to leave this discussion at this. It's not so important what I think.
Sorry for the typos I am cooking and working on my iPad at the same time.
And I like you too bergere - where did your site go?