Arcadia Discussion Zone

I agree with Dave Rowett about the '2' figure in the Yellow robe in the Poussin painting.
Yes, the Rennes mystery is live and well to this day, or should we say alive and sick!
Sauniere was threatened with the assassination of Marie D if he revealed some great secret though he may not actuallty have seen that particular message as that particular letter was not under his hand.
But BS wrote of some great secret that he couldn't reveal but left clues for a future generation which is NOW.
He had to endure this pressure and lies from 'The Order'. So what has changed? The pressure continues to this day and has done throughout the centuries.
Why would a group within the Cambridge University suddenly fold under the pressure and go down without a fight?
As long as this alleged idea is present and kept sub rosa the mystery has power to exercise authority and does.
We can all feel what Sauniere and Gelis experienced as we engage in this meaningful exploit.
A picture can convey a thousand words.

This painting holds many strange abnormalities. The number 2 is just one of them. There are much, much more and they are nothing to do with what was written in the article.
Lets just say that Poussin was a clever bloke.

would you be the slightest bit interested in Poussin if de Cherisey hadnt included his name into his riddle?

To be honest I'm not interested in the validity of the parchments at this moment in time. I am interested in the Poussin and it's content at the moment, when I've finished with the painting i'll be in a better position to judge the parchments.
At the moment though, I can assure you with the greatest of confidence that Mr Poussin had been particularly busy doing strange things to this painting.
The number 2 gave me an insight into what he was doing and how he was doing it. Just makes me giggle what he's been up to. How no ones seen it is beyond me - it really is.

Dave, the number two is a crease in the garment, the fact that you have to turn the painting round to see it doesn’t make any sense. There is no reason why he wouldn’t/couldn’t have painted a number into the composition if he wanted to. Would you be interested in Poussin or his paintings if they weren’t included into the RLC mystery?

It's not just about the number 2, it's about some more stuff I've found which I will show later when i've finished trying to fathom what the hell he's trying to say.
Of course i'm interested in the paintings because they are mentioned in the parchments, why wouldn't I be?

No its not a crease and the fact you have to turn the painting upside down is very relevant.
It is not the only thing you have to do to this painting either. Mr Poussin has been a very naughty boy.

Andrew,

Can you explain something for me.

I am wondering why Duncan Burden has been given special consideration to present an article as he has.

As you have confirmed, there is much more material behind what has already been disclosed.

What is the point of leaving his "revelations" at the point it was left?

Why disclose you have signed an NDA and that more detailed information has been granted to you?

Is this the first of a series of "revelations" or will it be left as it is.

Of itself, I can't see that the Key revealed is anything new. This is a well known ancient symbol.

So why bother?

Why dangle these things before us? This is no different than Roger, Tingra, Sheila and Renne et al dangling daily the Crista before us.

I have been around these sorts of discussion groups for many years and I have seen many people "reveal" things which are piecemeal and pretend to be the keepers of a deeper truth.

I believe that anyone that actually knows the Truth has no need to say they know the Truth. On this basis alone I would question the motives of anyone that promotes themselves as the keeper of the Truth.

One of the great admonitions of the initiates is TACERE.

Don't you think you owe us an explanation?

excuse me, but i beg to differ here....

Can you explain why?

certainly....

i have never dangled anything.

OK I'll discount you from the 4 named.

May be I can help.
I believe the phrase you are looking for is.............

" I don't wanna talk about it"

Does that help?

Kid Creole

And i object to being bunched in with Renne who knows sweet FA
.

Sorry, insufficient grounds for being excluded.

i dont dangle either

OK, you're excluded from the list.

Anyone else pleading not guilty to the charge?


It reminds me of the criminal in the dock saying:

"I am innocent of all the crimes I have commited".

In this country you are innocent until proven guilty
Is loyalty a crime?

Osama bin Laden was loyal to a cause - it may not be a crime but it can cost you your life.

Pass the knockando, Hotie, Its all unravelling.
Could this be a new controversy ?

So no one has defended the Crista ?
Nurse ! The screens !

TD

Sorry, it's every man/woman for himself.

whew for once I'm not on a list

Dave interesting twist on the two
could it be the Lady is pregnant

Are you comparing me to Binned Laden
Bloody hell , Rocker Tommys campaign is doing better than i thought

That can be easily fixed - are you submitting yourself for examination?