Arcadia Discussion Zone

Forums dedicated to history's mysteries, Rennes-le-Château and beyond…

Read the Arcadia Forum House Rules

It is currently 22 May 2013 1:22 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2872 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86 ... 115  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 25 Jun 2012 1:54 pm 
Offline
Grand Master

Joined: 10 Jan 2010 10:10 pm
Posts: 922
Location: pennsylvania
tingra wrote:
its not decorating an altar, its decorating a pedestal :D


Thanks for the correction.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 25 Jun 2012 5:30 pm 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 8916
Location: Los Angeles
Sonar wrote:
His main theme was to decry Vatican propaganda, and that has long been mainstream not abnormal among thinking people imo. I've not heard you say anything about a 'well known lying legend' before.


"Vatican propaganda" about... what, specifically?

TCP


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 25 Jun 2012 6:42 pm 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 8916
Location: Los Angeles
Thomas D. wrote:
tingra wrote:
Sonar, allow me to clear up a few misconceptions about this subject for you :D

A few years ago a former member here (Roger) brought the subject of the crista to the forum. A few of us, that have now been christened the Crista Crew decided to research the existence of this object using as a base the work of Anne Lombard Jourdan who mentions the crista in her book. It all started off pretty amicably, it was a new subject initiated by a member who had a vast knowledge of the RLC genre and who also had a family background entwined into the history of the object in question.
In the beginning we were given a few hints and clues about where to research further, some of us followed those hints, others didn’t bother but still wanted answers regarding its existence, this lead to various heated arguments and the subject soon became one of contention. Andrew provided “the Crista crew” with a private forum so the research carried on off the main board and sometimes off the forum completely as certain information became available, information that we were asked to keep confidential. That was when the shit really hit the fan, we were subjected to threats, computers were hacked, e mails, bizarre telephone calls etc etc, and as a consequence of all that there was some parting of the ways, there was no longer any pleasure in the subject for some of us once it became political…..its as simple as that. :roll:

In conclusion, the subject is no longer discussed on here, what started out as an interesting subject turned into a bizarre series of events both on and off the forum, events that still continue with certain posters obsessions today…..



Sonar,
Let me offer an alternative perspective to the one given above..................
The discussion started amicably enough and the research was viewed and discussed by many. However, it became apparent that it wasn't a genuine voyage of discovery, as Tingra says "we were given a few hints and clues".


Even the existence of the "object" itself was speculative, Anne Lombard-Jourdain was merely postulating on a possible object link between a "cresta" of a Roman legionary standard and the fleur-de-lis adopted as an heraldic symbol by the Capetians. There is no actual object known to exist, she was looking at other objects and suggesting that these might be the "crista." The magical "druid" healing powers assigned to the object, and the tale of Saunière wielding it/them, were add-ons courtesy of IBJ and his promotion team here on Arcadia.

Thomas D. wrote:
To some of us it was clear that the discussion was being led and directed in a certain direction by some in full possession of the facts who were managing a staged release of info into the public domaine.
As questions were asked about the motives of certain contributors the debate became increasingly acrimonious as it became clear that it wasn't going to plan.


What else could they do?

Thomas D. wrote:
The Private Forum was secret until its existence was detected through the co-ordinated nature and frequency of the posts of those who became known as 'Team Crista'. Its existence was denied by those seeking to control the dialogue for their own ends. Its nice to hear about it finally.


They developed a pattern, having seen it so many times in the past on other forums it wasn't hard to spot.

Thomas D. wrote:
As Tingra mentioned 'Roger' it seems fair to discuss his role.
It turned out (by his own admittance) that his intention in directing the thread was to spike a book due to be published on the subject over which he had no control. Once piecemeal release of info had spoilt the book and the thread had got out of control he announced that the subject was closed and he " didnt want to talk about it anymore".


Oh yes, absolutely. Roger provided me with a manuscript early on, before the "launch" and had me sign a confidentiality agreement before he'd send it. He was also asking me for publishing recommendations as they wanted out of their deal with Filip Coppens. Funny side story - the fax number he gave me to receive and return the signed agreement had an odd area code (not from a location Roger had ever pretended to be from) and while he told me it was his "efax" number, he told another researcher that it was the fax number at his grace-and-favor office at the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame in Cleveland, Ohio. The odd thing was that the RRHF is located in metropolitan Cleveland, which uses the area code 216; his was the area code for the Cleveland suburbs, 440. Intrigued, I contacted the RRHF, telling them I'd received a fax from someone there whose name wasn't on the cover sheet or the attachment; could they please give that person my name and number and have them contact me? I was told it was unlikely that the fax came from their location, because of the area code; but that it could be a home fax for someone who worked there. They would ask and get back to me. Fortunately their full-time staff is quite limited; I received a call the next day telling me that no one on staff recognized that number or had faxed me. So, I took the next logical step for the innately curious and paid $10.95 to have the number back-traced - to a residential land line in the Cleveland suburbs, as predicted.

Thomas D. wrote:
Tingra confirmed this morning, however unwittingly, for the first time that he had strong family ties to the object and, as such the thread had only ever been damage limitation rather than a genuine piece of research.


That's a new one on me, too. I'd always figured Roger to be more clever and calculating than to go down the bloodline path, especially here with so many cynics on board (though it does put more recent events in a clearer spotlight, I must say). He always claimed to be a member of Italy's former ruling family, although from the "French branch" as though it and the "Italian branch" aren't one and the same. The family's detailed genealogy lacks qualified candidates to be our Roger, at least in terms of his age and some of his biographical particulars as revealed when we were on speaking terms. I suppose we shouldn't assume any of that information was genuine though.

Thomas D. wrote:
Although now removed when he retired 'hors de combat' from the Forum it would be fair to say that his posts were characterised by an imperious and high-handed attitude to those who didn't kow-tow. A real shame because, as I always believed, he was probably in a position to have answered most of the questions over RLC had he so desired. However, in light of these family ties some might conclude there are questions still to be asked about his role in these events.


Looks can be deceptive, Thomas, because while the imperious tone may have been an effective means to lend some semblance of authenticity and privileged access to "inner circles", he never actually said anything of substance that would suggest there's any truth to it. And, by his own admission, he was rather a late-comer to the party, a Dan Brown convert who quickly saw the lay of the landscape.

Thomas D. wrote:
The subject is no longer discussed here because it no longer suits the agenda of those who originally wanted to discuss it. The existence of an object of extreme antiquity and importance was given a public profile by the former contributor for reasons that some might conclude were slightly disingenuous to say the least.


Yes, and presented to me as something "quite" different in terms of motivation from the get-go. Not sure whether the intended effect was to keep me neutral or get me to play along.

Thomas D. wrote:
My own role was merely to question the stage managing of events and the illogicality of the discourse. This attracted some fairly trenchant criticism and a startling degree of personal abuse from certain quarters which reflected poorly on those involved. I've never felt the need to reciprocate this undignified behavior.


There was no need to, keeping your sense of humor served you well.

Thomas D. wrote:
Most of the original posts were deleted upon Roger's departure but the 'rump' of Team Crista still carry a torch as you can see, quite touching really! :wink:
If there was an award for PR disaster this whole sorry, mismanaged episode would definitely be a nominee.


For me it would be a contender, but it's got some pretty strong competition. We've had no shortage of hoaxes go bad here.

Thomas D. wrote:
I would welcome any comments from Forum members who were members at the time and feel I've misrepresented the events in any way or from those who feel that this is a fair summation.
TD :wink:


I think you've done a wonderful job in summation. :wink:

TCP


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 25 Jun 2012 6:53 pm 
Offline
High King

Joined: 15 May 2008 7:42 pm
Posts: 4107
Location: NEWCASTLE on the Tyne
A pretty good job at character assassination if nothing else.....you do each other proud.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 25 Jun 2012 7:13 pm 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 8916
Location: Los Angeles
tingra wrote:
A pretty good job at character assassination if nothing else.....you do each other proud.


"Roger" was nothing more than an alias in an internet forum, Tingra; he has no character to assassinate, he's one-dimensional, not real. The identity of the person developing that character, playing the part of their fictional construct, is still hidden. And as I'm sure neither one of us has ever met him/her in person, their character is very much an unknown quality.

Or did you believe that all of this is real...? :lol:

TCP


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 25 Jun 2012 7:46 pm 
Offline
High King

Joined: 15 May 2008 7:42 pm
Posts: 4107
Location: NEWCASTLE on the Tyne
No doubt your alter ego will be popping in soon, perhaps he will continue this entertaining stitch up with the non entities alleged obituary, the one he is supposed to have :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 25 Jun 2012 7:59 pm 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 8916
Location: Los Angeles
tingra wrote:
No doubt your alter ego will be popping in soon, perhaps he will continue this entertaining stitch up with the non entities alleged obituary, the one he is supposed to have :lol:


That should be entertaining, but I'm afraid it wouldn't be my alter-ego since he doesn't know anything about an obituary. Explain?

TCP


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 25 Jun 2012 9:03 pm 
Offline
High King

Joined: 15 May 2008 7:42 pm
Posts: 4107
Location: NEWCASTLE on the Tyne
Thomas D. wrote:
Tingra confirmed this morning, however unwittingly, for the first time that he had strong family ties to the object and, as such the thread had only ever been damage limitation rather than a genuine piece of research.


Tingra confirmed no such thing :lol: :lol:

there was no new revelation or slip up, Roger mentioned his family connection a long time ago........you werent paying attention, nice try though.

"The characterization of "shameful" is merely based on my point of view (a Christian and a member of a prominent aristocratic family interwoven with this history in the distant past). It is purely my personal nostalgic view and I daresay that many on this forum and in the airy-fairy world of new age beliefs wouldn't find it "shameful" at all."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 25 Jun 2012 9:45 pm 
Offline
High King

Joined: 15 May 2008 7:42 pm
Posts: 4107
Location: NEWCASTLE on the Tyne
TCP wrote:
That should be entertaining, but I'm afraid it wouldn't be my alter-ego since he doesn't know anything about an obituary. Explain?

TCP


glad to hear that.... So you haven’t been privy to an alleged obituary that is apparently held on file with certain newspapers in case of a prominent persons sudden death? An alleged obituary that is being passed around the forums pm system, an obituary allegedly appertaining to a persons life and death that "doesn’t exist"?

unless the person that PMd me that little gem made it all up, just for giggles :shock: ......quite sickening that anyone would go to those lengths dont you agree? :roll:

Edited to add....

The private forum was kept quiet because Andrew wanted it that way, it was a new concept he was trying out, nothing sinister.....ask him, he will confirm it I am sure.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 25 Jun 2012 10:06 pm 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 8916
Location: Los Angeles
tingra wrote:
TCP wrote:
That should be entertaining, but I'm afraid it wouldn't be my alter-ego since he doesn't know anything about an obituary. Explain?

TCP


glad to hear that.... So you haven’t been privy to an alleged obituary that is apparently held on file with certain newspapers in case of a prominent persons sudden death? An alleged obituary that is being passed around the forums pm system, an obituary allegedly appertaining to a persons life and death that "doesn’t exist"?

unless the person that PMd me that little gem made it all up, just for giggles :shock: ......quite sickening that anyone would go to those lengths dont you agree? :roll:

Sleep well.....


I'm familiar with the practice of keeping obits for prominent people on file with newspapers (from an old episode of the Mary Tyler Moore Show - "Chuckles Bites the Dust") but no, I'm not privy to anything like that being passed around.

Seems to me there would only be one person with a vested interest in circulating something like that, though. :lol:

TCP


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Rome?
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 12:23 am 
Offline
High King
User avatar

Joined: 05 Dec 2008 1:46 am
Posts: 4201
Location: Tucson, Az. USA
IBJ was not the one who threatened a lawsuit over the image, I assume that the person who did owns the copyright to the image.

It appears to be a heavy machine embroidery - perhaps on a robe. The owners of the object seemed to be Catholic, I thought the

owner of the image to be a Catholic. It was thought to be housed in the Catherdral of Toledo, correct? Crimson Ghost, you are a relatively

new member to me, what do you know of the history?

_________________
From the Borderlands - mjastudio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 12:28 am 
Offline
High King
User avatar

Joined: 26 Oct 2006 7:46 am
Posts: 2486
Location: Albion
tingra wrote:
Thomas D. wrote:
Tingra confirmed this morning, however unwittingly, for the first time that he had strong family ties to the object and, as such the thread had only ever been damage limitation rather than a genuine piece of research.


Tingra confirmed no such thing :lol: :lol:

there was no new revelation or slip up, Roger mentioned his family connection a long time ago........you werent paying attention, nice try though.

"The characterization of "shameful" is merely based on my point of view (a Christian and a member of a prominent aristocratic family interwoven with this history in the distant past). It is purely my personal nostalgic view and I daresay that many on this forum and in the airy-fairy world of new age beliefs wouldn't find it "shameful" at all."


Tina, you're soooo funny!
Since posting " let it go " you've posted 4/5 times and each time you're making it worse!
What on earth did he promise you on your trip to New York? :lol: :lol:
You really fell for it honey!
I'm guessing that you've received new instructions from HQ and the quotation above is an alleged post from the Former
contributor, Roger?
The problem is that when he slunk away with his tail between his legs he had all his posts deleted.
So, why should we believe that this is even close to accurate? Did he come up with this in the last 24 hours? :lol:

Just for the record which 'Aristocratic Family' does your client claim he belongs to?
Can he prove it or is it just another Arcadia fantasy ? :lol:
TD :lol: :lol:

_________________
" The evidence must be interrogated by minds trained in a discipline of attentive disbelief"
E. P. Thompson, 'The Poverty of Theory


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Historic Family
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 12:32 am 
Offline
High King
User avatar

Joined: 05 Dec 2008 1:46 am
Posts: 4201
Location: Tucson, Az. USA
Is Roger related to the priests who were the guardians of the object?

_________________
From the Borderlands - mjastudio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 12:37 am 
Offline
Adept
User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2012 1:15 pm
Posts: 86
That'd be a difficult relationship to establish since above posts imply that Roger is a fictional character whose ? counterfeit obituary was recently circulated, just as the object is only theorised. It gets more soap opera like by the day. I'm hooked.

_________________
Thunder - Perfect Mind


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 12:42 am 
Offline
Grand Master

Joined: 11 Jan 2008 12:38 am
Posts: 937
Location: Australia
Sonar wrote:
That'd be a difficult relationship to establish since above posts imply that Roger is a fictional character whose ? counterfeit obituary was recently circulated. It gets more soap opera like by the day. I'm hooked.


And you've not been here 2/52 yet...... :lol:

_________________
Man is a social animal who
hates his fellow man.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 1:00 am 
Offline
High King
User avatar

Joined: 22 Jun 2009 10:28 pm
Posts: 4213
Location: NA
Thomas D. wrote:
I'm guessing that you've received new instructions from HQ and the quotation above is an alleged post from the Former
contributor, Roger?
The problem is that when he slunk away with his tail between his legs he had all his posts deleted.
So, why should we believe that this is even close to accurate? Did he come up with this in the last 24 hours?


I remember that post because I thought he taking a sideswipe at 'people like me' , lovuian and Renne. I remember thinking at the time - how could the new-agers et al think anything at all when nobody knows what it does. So I read the post quite a few times to try and work out what it meant.

In other words Tingra didn't make it up. You mustn't have read it Thomas but then again you wouldn't have thought to read it closely because it had nought to do with you.

Quote:
(a Christian and a member of a prominent aristocratic family interwoven with this history in the distant past).


As for this part of the quote - I'm pretty sure there are others that have read it in the past and remember his reference to his alledged family situation.
I assumed everyone knew - he didn't really hide that he came from that type of family.

EDIT TO ADD: I also made note of the comment at the time because he said 'Christian" and not 'Catholic' which is unusual distinction to make.

_________________
************


Last edited by rain on 26 Jun 2012 1:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 1:08 am 
Offline
High King
User avatar

Joined: 22 Jun 2009 10:28 pm
Posts: 4213
Location: NA
Thomas D. wrote:
The problem is that when he slunk away with his tail between his legs he had all his posts deleted.


And... you're speculating as to who deleted the posts - how about coming up with the evidence on who deleted the posts because while all have a certain ability to delete individual posts as users - we don't control the servers - so deleting wholesale 1000's of posts immediately is near impossible - this is Andrew's forum and therefore the ability lies with Administrator.

That's just common sense.

_________________
************


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 2:34 am 
Offline
Grand Master
User avatar

Joined: 19 Feb 2011 12:02 pm
Posts: 1451
rain wrote:
Thomas D. wrote:
The problem is that when he slunk away with his tail between his legs he had all his posts deleted.


And... you're speculating as to who deleted the posts - how about coming up with the evidence on who deleted the posts because while all have a certain ability to delete individual posts as users - we don't control the servers - so deleting wholesale 1000's of posts immediately is near impossible - this is Andrew's forum and therefore the ability lies with Administrator.

That's just common sense.



Rain,

Precisely, I presume that's why TD said "he had". Roger seems to have more pull than most.

_________________
"That historical explanation cannot deal in absolutes and cannot adduce sufficient causes greatly irritates some simple and impatient souls"
E. P. Thompson, The Poverty of Theory


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 2:52 am 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 8916
Location: Los Angeles
hotspur wrote:
rain wrote:
Thomas D. wrote:
The problem is that when he slunk away with his tail between his legs he had all his posts deleted.


And... you're speculating as to who deleted the posts - how about coming up with the evidence on who deleted the posts because while all have a certain ability to delete individual posts as users - we don't control the servers - so deleting wholesale 1000's of posts immediately is near impossible - this is Andrew's forum and therefore the ability lies with Administrator.

That's just common sense.



Rain,

Precisely, I presume that's why TD said "he had". Roger seems to have more pull than most.


That's my understanding as well - all the "Roger" posts were deleted when the account was deleted. An administrator would have had to do it though, probably at "Roger's" insistence.

TCP


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 2:57 am 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 8916
Location: Los Angeles
rain wrote:
Quote:
(a Christian and a member of a prominent aristocratic family interwoven with this history in the distant past).


As for this part of the quote - I'm pretty sure there are others that have read it in the past and remember his reference to his alledged family situation.
I assumed everyone knew - he didn't really hide that he came from that type of family.

EDIT TO ADD: I also made note of the comment at the time because he said 'Christian" and not 'Catholic' which is unusual distinction to make.


Roger had made several references in the past to his family being "that" type of family. He also identified the family to some, but a perusal of that family's genealogy raises a few questions about the veracity of his claim.

TCP


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 3:06 am 
Offline
High King
User avatar

Joined: 22 Jun 2009 10:28 pm
Posts: 4213
Location: NA
hotspur wrote:
rain wrote:
Thomas D. wrote:
The problem is that when he slunk away with his tail between his legs he had all his posts deleted.


And... you're speculating as to who deleted the posts - how about coming up with the evidence on who deleted the posts because while all have a certain ability to delete individual posts as users - we don't control the servers - so deleting wholesale 1000's of posts immediately is near impossible - this is Andrew's forum and therefore the ability lies with Administrator.

That's just common sense.



Rain,

Precisely, I presume that's why TD said "he had". Roger seems to have more pull than most.


With the Administrator? There is no evidence to suggest that and it doesn't seem feasible that this was the case but only the Adminstrator knows what happened since he is the one with control over those Admin rights.

_________________
************


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 3:15 am 
Offline
High King
User avatar

Joined: 22 Jun 2009 10:28 pm
Posts: 4213
Location: NA
TCP wrote:
rain wrote:
Quote:
(a Christian and a member of a prominent aristocratic family interwoven with this history in the distant past).


As for this part of the quote - I'm pretty sure there are others that have read it in the past and remember his reference to his alledged family situation.
I assumed everyone knew - he didn't really hide that he came from that type of family.

EDIT TO ADD: I also made note of the comment at the time because he said 'Christian" and not 'Catholic' which is unusual distinction to make.


Roger had made several references in the past to his family being "that" type of family. He also identified the family to some, but a perusal of that family's genealogy raises a few questions about the veracity of his claim.

TCP


I thought Savoy meant they owned a chain of 5 star Hotels. I must looked a bit dense and I thought everyone else knew except for me - and I was the last one to find out as per normal.
In fact I'm still confused because I thought France was a Republic that it didn't matter if someone was from an Aristocratic family because the title wouldn't be recognised in France as such.

EDIT TO ADD: Which I don't think is too bad - because I think Thomas thinks Roger's family comes from the Saveloy sausage family.

_________________
************


Last edited by rain on 26 Jun 2012 4:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 3:58 am 
Offline
Adept
User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2012 1:15 pm
Posts: 86
I support cheerio's more than savs.

_________________
Thunder - Perfect Mind


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 4:04 am 
Offline
High King
User avatar

Joined: 22 Jun 2009 10:28 pm
Posts: 4213
Location: NA
Sonar wrote:
I support cheerio's more than savs.


Cheerio certainly sounds Happier as in Cheery but Savs can be deep fried in batter and dipped in Tomato Sauce at the fair, so it's a toss-up.

_________________
************


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Crista Controversy?
PostPosted: 26 Jun 2012 4:07 am 
Offline
Queen Bee
User avatar

Joined: 31 May 2008 12:53 am
Posts: 8916
Location: Los Angeles
rain wrote:
I thought Savoy meant they owned a chain of 5 star Hotels. I must looked a bit dense and I thought everyone else knew except for me - and I was the last one to find out as per normal.
In fact I'm still confused because I thought France was a Republic that it didn't matter if someone was from an Aristocratic family because the title wouldn't be recognised in France as such.


They're allowed as a courtesy these days, that's about all.

rain wrote:
EDIT TO ADD: Which I don't think is too bad - because I think Thomas thinks Roger's family comes from the Saveloy sausage family.


That's probably closer to the truth.

TCP


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2872 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86 ... 115  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group