On a different topic altogether, you seem to ascribe some credibility to Mr. Haywood. Can you explain why? Surely you know that almost everyone else thinks he's a poor study and quite the joker.
I ENJOYED MY MEETINGS WITH HIM. IS HE IN THE PRIORY? NO IDEA. IS A FANTASIST? MAYBE. DOES IT MATTER? NOT REALLY? HISTORY DOES SEEM TO THROW UP THESE BIZARRELY COLORFUL CHARACTERS LIKE NIC & PLANTARD, BUT WHAT IS THEIR PURPOSE WE SHOUDL ASK OURSELVES.
Yes, I believe it matters who Haywood and Plantard are.
1.) Plantard had ties to Le Cercle that has been described as a foreign policy think-tank specialising in international security
which include keeping intelligence on revolutionary parties, cults, psuedo religious organisations, Occult corporate interactions, historical readactives and policy/politics/power exchanges.
While maybe low on the ladder Plantard was able to use these mysteries to his advantage and provide deep level disinformation that continues to this day. If Haywood is of this "Joker set" then is he someone that has used his position to forward his agenda???
Haywood was identified on another thread as using Freemasonry signals which suggests he identified his interview in Bloodline with Political Anglo-centric Freemasonry ideology and political-security agenda.
2.) Your partner claims you did not know who Haywood was before the film and you hired a P.I. to research him, is this correct? And yet when looking over you body of work I noticed you did work for his father's charity and I assumed you would have prior contact at least with knowledge of him beforehand.
3.) You also work closely with advertising groups that promote Israeli-American interests, is this correct? Your advertising for "Bloodline" used a viral marketing campaign, Correct?
4.) Why did you choose the name "blue book films?"
5.) From your websitehttp://www.bruce-burgess.com/mainpage.html
Bruce has been writing, producing and directing for over sixteen years on a diverse range of subjects from ancient mysteries and the paranormal to global terrorism and the British Monarchy.
......He was formerly chariman of Transmedia Productions, one of Britain's largest television production company's, a media adviser to the British Conservative Party, and a fundraising patron of the Royal Shakespeare company.
And what do you think you've learned in such diverse ranges of topics? And what to your mind are the links?
You also work with some very dangerous people including a unit of the Spanish Police Bodyguards - "In the firing line
and you were doing some prep on a doco about "elite israeli commando unit" The sion ??? Which seems to have dissappeared.
How do you reconcile such serious topics with dealing with the Jokester element of the mythical "Priory of Sion" and bloodline characters which you clearly have issues with now?
BTW when you say Jokester in English there are only a few translations such as The Fool, the iniate, the realised.
In French there are about 18 different levels or there abouts of the Jokester and it is a specific vernacular relating to the level of an esotericist and their ranking according to their abilities. Plantard never aspired to being an occultist in the strictest sense unlike De Cherisey it seems, he used it for political leanings although he seemed to be conversant in it's language - We know people such as Da Vinci (at one stage Armand Hammer owned the Codex Leicester - 18 sheets completing 72 page document
), Calve(through her mother which were identified as being Nightingales) , Verne, Sands and artists Dali and Cocteau were.
I just though I would mention this because when you use the terminology it implies that you think they were "JOKESTERS" and all that goes along with that.