The English Connection

roscoe · **Joined:** 02 Dec 2006 3:44 pm **Posts:** 6963

Caelum wrote:

OMG!! What have I done?!!

Too late. You've muddied the waters too much to apologise now

roscoe · **Joined:** 02 Dec 2006 3:44 pm **Posts:** 6963

TCP wrote:

roscoe wrote:

You're thinking about P F J Freeman aren't you?

No.

roscoe wrote:

Whether or not GAYLORD Freeman actually signed it or not is speculation on your part.

Is it?

roscoe wrote:

P F J Freeman? Tell me more?

Not even close.

TCP

We have a quiz show on UK TV called POINTLESS shall I put your name forward as a contestant. I see a great opportunity for you?

roscoe · **Joined:** 02 Dec 2006 3:44 pm **Posts:** 6963

lovuian wrote:

roscoe wrote:

rain wrote:

Would we recognise him. And I notice the word synarchy in the link.

If these gentlemen from the First National Bank of Chicago aren't guilty of p.d.s membership isn't it odd that Plantard should use them when you look at their known history?

Quote:

Vaincre No. 3, September 1989, page 22
Managing Editor: Thomas PLANTARD de SAINT-CLAIR
110, Rue Henri Dunant, 92700 COLOMBES

SOME ARCHIVES OF THE ‘PRIORY OF SION’ DISCOVERED IN BARCELONA…

The Grand Masters of the PRIORY OF SION:

(...)

1969…John DRICK

Source: Vaincre

I'd like to point out that these people were alive when Plantard et al were accusing them of being members of the P.D.S. This is libelous and they knew what Plantard was saying about them because the HBHG team had contacted them.

Roscoe didn't Plantard have a falling out with the AMERICAN side of the PDS
if these gentlemen belonged ...it shows the power of the PDS
The First National Bank of Chicago

there is a history here

Chicago-based retail and commercial bank tracing its roots back to 1863. Over the years, the bank operated under several names including The First National Bank of Chicago and First Chicago NBD (following its 1995 merger with the National Bank of Detroit). In 1998, First Chicago NBD merged with Banc One Corporation to form Bank One Corporation, today a part of CHASE.

in the 1860s, financing the American Civil War.

JPMorgan Chase, in its current structure, is the result of the combination of several large U.S. banking companies over the last decade including Chase Manhattan Bank, J.P. Morgan & Co., Bank One, Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual. Going back further, its predecessors include major banking firms among which are Chemical Bank, Manufacturers Hanover, First Chicago Bank, National Bank of Detroit, Texas Commerce Bank, Providian Financial and Great Western Bank.

Milton Friedman was from the University of Chicago and gave us big lie of supply side economics

The bankers control everything.

Spartacus Paraclete · **Joined:** 30 Dec 2009 12:04 pm **Posts:** 1906

Roscoe wrote:

Quote:

Thanks for the guess, I'll let you know.

Oh, ok. Your guesses are better are they? Pull the other one, Roscoe, it has bells on it...

Roscoe wrote:

Quote:

Meanwhile Plantard did have the French Secret police after him when he had accused the Multi-Millionaire Roger-Patrice Pelat, who was the financial backing of the French President François Mitterrand to be a member of the Prieuré de Sion secret society and went to Pelat's insider trading trial. Pelat was involved in the L' affaire Pechiney-Triangle

Still with the 'accused' crap! I thought Plantard and Pelat were supposed to be co-members of the same ultra-secret society :roll:

. Can you show any evidence that Pelat was indeed a member of the Priory of Sion or was even an associate of Pierre Plantard? If not, it is utterly irrelevant to point out what affairs Pelat was involved in, without first acknowledging that Plantard and/or the Priory of Sion had no genuine connect with said events!

Roscoe quoted this:

Quote:

"In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish efforts rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world.This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide revolutionary conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster has ably shown, a definite recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworlds of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of the enormous empire.
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews [ :!:

]. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders... In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astounding. And the prominent if not the principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the extraordinary Commissions for combating Counter Revolution has been take by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many nonJews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.

("Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People." ILLUSTRATED SUNDAY HERALD, London, February 8, 1920.)

Yes, Roscoe, I'm sure Churchill (and all the rest of the then status-quo) were indeed utterly terrified at the thought of a secular/atheistic revolution, whose aim was equality for all!

Can you explain, in your own words, how exactly one can be an 'atheistic Jew'?

As for your Sutton link, this is the description:

Quote:

...a brilliant interview with one of the greatest researchers ever, Professor Antony Sutton, the author of Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution and Wall Street and The Rise of Hitler, where he showes how bankers, businessmen and politicans in the west supported and financed both the communist and the nazis, all according to their hegelian dialectic plan for world control.

Are you claiming that all these 'bankers, businessmen and politicans in the west' are 'atheistic Jews'?

Btw, you never got back to me about that 1955 Merovingian article from the Daily Express? What did you make of the article yourself?

And what is the relationship between Lord Beaverbrook and Alexander Aikman, and William Montagu and John Montague-Brocklebank?

roscoe · **Joined:** 02 Dec 2006 3:44 pm **Posts:** 6963

Spartacus Paraclete wrote:

Yes, Roscoe, I'm sure Churchill (and all the rest of the then status-quo) were indeed utterly terrified at the thought of a secular/atheistic revolution, whose aim was equality for all!

Can you explain, in your own words, how exactly one can be an 'atheistic Jew'?

Well I suspect you with a username like Spartacus Paraclete would be better qualified to Channel Winston Churchill and ask him what he meant. But let me throw in my twopenneth by saying that they maybe one (with a Jewish mother) who doesn't believe he has been covenanted by G_d as a member of the chosen people but nevertheless can reap the rewards of the fringe benefits and have a Zionist homeland and benefit from the throwing out of the indigenous people who were already there.

Spartacus Paraclete wrote:

As for your Sutton link, this is the description:

Quote:

...a brilliant interview with one of the greatest researchers ever, Professor Antony Sutton, the author of Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution and Wall Street and The Rise of Hitler, where he showes how bankers, businessmen and politicans in the west supported and financed both the communist and the nazis, all according to their hegelian dialectic plan for world control.

Are you claiming that all these 'bankers, businessmen and politicans in the west' are 'atheisitc Jews'?

No not all. In fact nobody is. I take it you realise the difference between a Jew and a Zionist?

Spartacus Paraclete wrote:

Btw, you never got back to me about that 1955 Merovingian article from the Daily Express? What did you make of the article yourself?

And what is the relationship between Lord Beaverbrook and Alexander Aikman, and William Montagu and John Montague-Brocklebank?

Well you asked if anyone can provide you with proof. Well as you probably realise, I'm not just anyone.

Spartacus Paraclete · **Joined:** 30 Dec 2009 12:04 pm **Posts:** 1906

Roscoe, you proffered Churchill's ramblings to bolster your own claims, remember. In those ramblings, Churchill professed, in the extremely enlightened 1920s, to his fear of a world-wide revolutionary conspiracy to make everyone equal (an impossible task in his opinion), led mostly, he further claimed, by 'atheistic Jews'. So, again, YOU quoted Churchill's silly nonsense to support your own earlier nonsensical claims.

Roscoe wrote:

Quote:

Well I suspect you with a username like Spartacus Paraclete would be better qualified to Channel Winston Churchill and ask him what he meant [by an atheistic Jews].

And I suspect that with a username like Roscoe you're best qualified to talk about waffles and chicken...

http://www.roscoeschickenandwaffles.com/menu.html

Roscoe wrote:

Quote:

But let me throw in my twopenneth by saying that they maybe one (with a Jewish mother) who doesn't believe he has been covenanted by G_d as a member of the chosen people but nevertheless can reap the rewards of the fringe benefits and have a Zionist homeland and benefit from the throwing out of the indigenous people who were already there.

Despite the difficulty in translating such gibberish ('by saying that they maybe one (with a Jewish mother) :!:

'), might an 'atheistic Jew' simply be someone who has matured enough to have realised that following what are, IMHO, the three thousand-year-old superstitious dictates of nomadic goat-herders, may not be the most sensible life choice available in the modern world! Meaning that the person is now simply a secular atheist, rather than an 'atheist Jew'. Can there be such thing as an atheist Catholic? And perhaps atheists are simply more inclined to believe that universal equality is something that human culture should strive for!?

Spartacus wrote:

Quote:

Are you claiming that all these 'bankers, businessmen and politicans in the west' are 'atheistic Jews'?

Roscoe wrote:

Quote:

No not all. In fact nobody is.

Well, according to Churchill, in the quote YOU just quoted to bolster your nonsensical claims, most of the leaders of the 'world-wide conspiracy' to make people equal were 'atheistic Jews'!!!

Can't you even follow your own nonsense?

Roscoe wrote:

Quote:

I take it you realise the difference between a Jew and a Zionist?

Yes, of course. Churchill was a Zionist was he not?! It is unfortunate however that you do not know the difference :roll:

Spartacus Paraclete wrote:

Quote:

Btw, you never got back to me about that 1955 Merovingian article from the Daily Express? What did you make of the article yourself?

And what is the relationship between Lord Beaverbrook and Alexander Aikman, and William Montagu and John Montague-Brocklebank?

Roscoe wrote:

Quote:

Well you asked if anyone can provide you with proof. Well as you probably realise, I'm not just anyone.

Wow, I am actually embarrassed for you after that cracker... :oops:

So, Roscoe, you never got back to me about that 1955 Merovingian article from the Daily Express? What did you make of the article yourself?

And what is the relationship between Lord Beaverbrook and Alexander Aikman, and William Montagu and John Montague-Brocklebank?

And you also have yet to show what evidence you have that Pelat was associated with either Pierre Plantard or the Priory of Sion?

richard.webster · **Posted:** 18 Jan 2012 2:46 pm

Spartacus Paraclete wrote:

Quote:

Since the article in the Daily Express a paper with a circulation of 3,000,000, nobody in Britain is unaware of the demand for the recognition of Merovingian rights made in 1955 and 1956 by Sir Alexander Aikman and Sir John Montague Brocklebank.

Can anyone show that 'Aikman' or 'Montague Brocklebank' wrote an article demanding 'recognition of Merovingian rights' in the Daily Express?

I had a quick look into this on the UK Press Online website (link below), and they have an on-line archive for the Daily Express going back to the year 1900. I'm not a paid subscriber, and so couldn't read any of the articles, but could nevertheless type "merovingian" as a keyword into their search engine and see the results. It only generated ten hits, the earliest being the 20th August 1913 edition of the paper, and the latest being the 1st March 2006 edition, but with nothing in the 1950s, and in fact nothing between the years 1930 and 2000.

I'm only half-following the conversation today, so I don't know if that's of any help, but thought it was worth mentioning. One might perhaps try other keywords to search with.

http://www.ukpressonline.co.uk/ukpresso ... /index.jsp

Tertius · **Joined:** 12 Sep 2011 11:17 pm **Posts:** 412

C'est fou ce que l'ignorance peut rendre les gens bavards. Il n'y a jamais eu de Prieure de Sion Americain. Plus precisement, il n:y a jamais eu une telle organisation comportant des branches Americaines et Francaises. Le Prieure est une invention strictement Francaise et tres recente. Tous ceux qui pretendent autrement mentent ou bien se sont faits tromper. Point final.

TCP · **Posted:** 18 Jan 2012 7:16 pm

roscoe wrote:

You've said this all before, didn't like it then. Nothing has changed.

I was addressing Spartacus, not you. I could care less what you like or don't like.

TCP

TCP · **Posted:** 18 Jan 2012 7:18 pm

roscoe wrote:

You mean a member of a secret society denied he was a member of a secret society?

GASP! Well I never!!!!! :roll:

Or he was telling the truth, but that never seems to enter your realm of possibility.

TCP

TCP · **Posted:** 18 Jan 2012 7:24 pm

roscoe wrote:

The author of this piece was one:

WINSTON SPENCER CHURCHILL

You may have heard of him.

Maybe not

Why yes, I believe I have heard of him. Wasn't he the husband of Clementine Hozier? And isn't one of the candidates for Clementine's "unknown" father said to be Algernon Freeman-Mitford, 1st Baron Redesdale?

:lol:

TCP

TCP · **Posted:** 18 Jan 2012 7:26 pm

roscoe wrote:

We have a quiz show on UK TV called POINTLESS shall I put your name forward as a contestant. I see a great opportunity for you?

Funny!

TCP

TCP · **Posted:** 18 Jan 2012 7:36 pm

Tertius wrote:

C'est fou ce que l'ignorance peut rendre les gens bavards. Il n'y a jamais eu de Prieure de Sion Americain. Plus precisement, il n:y a jamais eu une telle organisation comportant des branches Americaines et Francaises. Le Prieure est une invention strictement Francaise et tres recente. Tous ceux qui pretendent autrement mentent ou bien se sont faits tromper. Point final.

That's correct, Roger, and as you're aware I've made this point several times in the past. What Plantard referred to as the "Anglo-American branch" of his "Priory" was nothing of the sort. They weren't members of, or in any way involved with, Plantard's folly. They were Englishmen and Americans who didn't want Plantard messing with their enterprise, which was the cause of what he referred to as a rupture. It was, in fact, a brush-off.

I'm really surprised you don't appear to know any of the background here, given that you used to assert otherwise. Perhaps you just don't want to admit it? :lol:

TCP

Pilrig · **Posted:** 18 Jan 2012 11:00 pm

roscoe wrote:

Pilrig wrote:

Caelum wrote:

Not the greatest books I've ever read, but pretty innovative for their time. My favorite little tidbit about "The Coming Race" is the popularity at the time of the word "vril" which Bulwer-Lytton coined for the energy force/magic substance that drove the technologies of the subterraneans. Apparently Victorians would just drop it into conversations like we might toss in the word "grok" and it led to the naming of a product from Burton on Trent: Bovril which loosely translates to "cow elixir".

The name of Burton-on-Trent reappears ? Hmmmm.

Bovril = cow elixir :lol:

You mean the home of PS? or is it BS? Same thing really.

Shhh! We're not allowed to mention his name on here.

You mean Paul Smith ? There I've mentioned him. But Burton-on-Trent is not only the abode of Mr Smith but also that of 'diplomat' for the Priory of Sion, Nicholas Haywood.

rain · **Posted:** 18 Jan 2012 11:21 pm

richard.webster wrote:

Spartacus Paraclete wrote:

Quote:

Since the article in the Daily Express a paper with a circulation of 3,000,000, nobody in Britain is unaware of the demand for the recognition of Merovingian rights made in 1955 and 1956 by Sir Alexander Aikman and Sir John Montague Brocklebank.

Can anyone show that 'Aikman' or 'Montague Brocklebank' wrote an article demanding 'recognition of Merovingian rights' in the Daily Express?

I had a quick look into this on the UK Press Online website (link below), and they have an on-line archive for the Daily Express going back to the year 1900. I'm not a paid subscriber, and so couldn't read any of the articles, but could nevertheless type "merovingian" as a keyword into their search engine and see the results. It only generated ten hits, the earliest being the 20th August 1913 edition of the paper, and the latest being the 1st March 2006 edition, but with nothing in the 1950s, and in fact nothing between the years 1930 and 2000.

I'm only half-following the conversation today, so I don't know if that's of any help, but thought it was worth mentioning. One might perhaps try other keywords to search with.

http://www.ukpressonline.co.uk/ukpresso ... /index.jsp

Read the sentence again. In fact read it quite a few times. :lol:

rain · **Posted:** 18 Jan 2012 11:24 pm

TCP wrote:

roscoe wrote:

The author of this piece was one:

WINSTON SPENCER CHURCHILL

You may have heard of him.

Maybe not

Why yes, I believe I have heard of him. Wasn't he the husband of Clementine Hozier? And isn't one of the candidates for Clementine's "unknown" father said to be Algernon Freeman-Mitford, 1st Baron Redesdale?

:lol:

He died in 1914 didn't he so he couldn't be the Freeman we're talking about.

TCP

lovuian · **Posted:** 18 Jan 2012 11:34 pm

TCP wrote:

Tertius wrote:

C'est fou ce que l'ignorance peut rendre les gens bavards. Il n'y a jamais eu de Prieure de Sion Americain. Plus precisement, il n:y a jamais eu une telle organisation comportant des branches Americaines et Francaises. Le Prieure est une invention strictement Francaise et tres recente. Tous ceux qui pretendent autrement mentent ou bien se sont faits tromper. Point final.

That's correct, Roger, and as you're aware I've made this point several times in the past. What Plantard referred to as the "Anglo-American branch" of his "Priory" was nothing of the sort. They weren't members of, or in any way involved with, Plantard's folly. They were Englishmen and Americans who didn't want Plantard messing with their enterprise, which was the cause of what he referred to as a rupture. It was, in fact, a brush-off.

I'm really surprised you don't appear to know any of the background here, given that you used to assert otherwise. Perhaps you just don't want to admit it? :lol:

TCP

I'm surprised too :shock:

It isn't all about Plantard...Phillipe had American friends ....so says Jean Luc
They attended his funeral of which Plantard wished to avoid them didn't attend his funeral
Does anybody know who these American friends were?
http://www.portail-rennes-le-chateau.com/chaumeil_decherisey_english.htm

lovuian · **Posted:** 19 Jan 2012 12:30 am

Robert Abboud has a connection to Amelia Earhart
she was his baby sitter

he built the International Bank
He was Military, Harvard and Freeman recruited him
http://ilhpa.hpa.state.il.us/Oral_History/Veterans_Remember/korean_war/Abboud_Rob/Abboud_Rob_4FNL.pdf
he had connections with the CIA...

roscoe · **Joined:** 02 Dec 2006 3:44 pm **Posts:** 6963

Spartacus Paraclete wrote:

Roscoe wrote:

Quote:

I take it you realise the difference between a Jew and a Zionist?

Yes, of course. Churchill was a Zionist was he not?! It is unfortunate however that you do not know the difference :roll:

Hmm! These people do. Click here

Is irmine there yet? Need the organ grinder. Had enough of the little chap on the left.

Spartacus Paraclete · **Joined:** 30 Dec 2009 12:04 pm **Posts:** 1906

roscoe wrote:

Spartacus Paraclete wrote:

Roscoe wrote:

Quote:

I take it you realise the difference between a Jew and a Zionist?

Yes, of course. Churchill was a Zionist was he not?! It is unfortunate however that you do not know the difference :roll:

Hmm! These people do. Click here

Is irmine there yet? Need the organ grinder. Had enough of the little chap on the left.

Well, as somebody 'who is not just anybody' ( :oops:

) I'd be very interested in hearing your opinion about that 1955 Merovingian article from the Daily Express? What did you make of the article, Roscoe?

And what is the relationship between Lord Beaverbrook and Alexander Aikman, and William Montagu and John Montague-Brocklebank?

And you also have yet to show what evidence you have that Pelat was associated with either Pierre Plantard or the Priory of Sion? Surely you have an opinion on this one. Weren't you in court taking notes during Plantard's appearance at the Pelat trial?

Spartacus Paraclete · **Joined:** 30 Dec 2009 12:04 pm **Posts:** 1906

richard.webster wrote:

Spartacus Paraclete wrote:

Quote:

Since the article in the Daily Express a paper with a circulation of 3,000,000, nobody in Britain is unaware of the demand for the recognition of Merovingian rights made in 1955 and 1956 by Sir Alexander Aikman and Sir John Montague Brocklebank.

Can anyone show that 'Aikman' or 'Montague Brocklebank' wrote an article demanding 'recognition of Merovingian rights' in the Daily Express?

I had a quick look into this on the UK Press Online website (link below), and they have an on-line archive for the Daily Express going back to the year 1900. I'm not a paid subscriber, and so couldn't read any of the articles, but could nevertheless type "merovingian" as a keyword into their search engine and see the results. It only generated ten hits, the earliest being the 20th August 1913 edition of the paper, and the latest being the 1st March 2006 edition, but with nothing in the 1950s, and in fact nothing between the years 1930 and 2000.

I'm only half-following the conversation today, so I don't know if that's of any help, but thought it was worth mentioning. One might perhaps try other keywords to search with.

http://www.ukpressonline.co.uk/ukpresso ... /index.jsp

Hi Richard,

Thank you kindly. Considering the above, why in your opinion is there no record of the publication of any such article demanding Merovingian rights in the Daily Express? Is there a way to examine the letters section of the Daily Express during the period in question?

Regards,

Spartacus

roscoe · **Joined:** 02 Dec 2006 3:44 pm **Posts:** 6963

Spartacus Paraclete wrote:

Well, as somebody 'who is not just anybody' ( :oops:

) I'd be very interested in hearing your opinion about that 1955 Merovingian article from the Daily Express? What did you make of the article, Roscoe?

And what is the relationship between Lord Beaverbrook and Alexander Aikman, and William Montagu and John Montague-Brocklebank?

And you also have yet to show what evidence you have that Pelat was associated with either Pierre Plantard or the Priory of Sion? Surely you have an opinion on this one. Weren't you in court taking notes during Plantard's appearance at the Pelat trial?

Any particular reason why you're insisting on discussing the wrong people.

irmine, I need irmine. You bore me.

Spartacus Paraclete · **Joined:** 30 Dec 2009 12:04 pm **Posts:** 1906

roscoe wrote:

Spartacus Paraclete wrote:

Well, as somebody 'who is not just anybody' ( :oops:

) I'd be very interested in hearing your opinion about that 1955 Merovingian article from the Daily Express? What did you make of the article, Roscoe?

And what is the relationship between Lord Beaverbrook and Alexander Aikman, and William Montagu and John Montague-Brocklebank?

And you also have yet to show what evidence you have that Pelat was associated with either Pierre Plantard or the Priory of Sion? Surely you have an opinion on this one. Weren't you in court taking notes during Plantard's appearance at the Pelat trial?

Any particular reason why you're insisting on discussing the wrong people.

irmine, I need irmine. You bore me.

So, absolutely no clue whatsoever, Roscoe. Ok, that's what I thought!

TCP · **Posted:** 19 Jan 2012 3:43 pm

roscoe wrote:

irmine, I need irmine. You bore me.

Irmine furs adorn the imperious
Severin, Severin awaits you there...

Yes, come out Irmine! Strike, dear mistress, and cure his heart!

Venus in Furs

TCP

lovuian · **Posted:** 19 Jan 2012 4:58 pm

My Goodness
David Freeman-Mitford, 2nd Baron Redesdale

My goodness what a family! :shock:

He was into gold mining but in Canada
his daughter and wife were Hitler supporters

His retreat was Inch Kenneth Scotland

Schmidt, Chauncey E
is on the list for Bohemian Grove
http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=571.0

Chauncey E. Schmidt, chairman of the board of the Bank of California, delivered before the Stanford Graduate School of Business Alumni Association in California on October 29, 1977, which deals with interdependency of nations.

http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/speeches/9986526/nation-world-president

Chauncey E. Schmidt, chairman of the board of the Bank of California, at the Davos Symposium, European Management Forum, in Switzerland, on February 8, 1979, which deals with the impact of the U.S. foreign policy on the world economy.
He eventually ends up at the Chicago bank as President

He looks to me Roscoe like a New World Order Fan

Arcadia Discussion Zone

The English Connection

Who is online