Arcadia Discussion Zone

It is confusing. I can only think in that case that Edith Starr Miller must have got the two of them muddled up, or else she meant to write: "the son of the author of the well known book Zanoni". The son who was Viceroy of India, and who became Ambassador to France (and who got a state funeral in Paris, no less) wasn't born until 1831, and Zanoni was written in 1842, so it must have been the father who wrote it. But the other details in the quote above might point to an occult interest on the part of the son as well, perhaps. Obviously an interesting family, though. I see the father coined the phrase "It was a dark and stormy night," at the beginning of one of his novels.

They call the school Unity School of Christianity but a more accurate name would be Unity School of Witchcraft. Many witches have in fact been associated with the Unity Church and are closely working with it to secretly destroy Christianity.

The Freeman family has all the earmarks of being one of the top 13 Illuminati families as my confidential sources reveal.

Bulwer-Lytton was an Occultist. He was a member of the Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia (SRIA).

The Nazis loved his book Zanoni and it's idea of the super race.

He was a great friend of Wilfred Scarwen Blunt IRA sympathizer and the granduncle of Poussin "expert" Anthony Blunt.

Very likely because he didn't, and the signature on the document didn't read "Gaylord" Freeman at all.

He makes for a marvelously intriguing smokescreen though. The actual gentleman in question couldn't hold a candle to him in terms of real accomplishment or influence. Except in the neo-chivalric netherworld, of course.







Freeman is a fairly common surname, it would be foolish to assume amalgamation. The one we're concerned with wasn't connected with the Chicago banker. He was the grandson of an authentic French prince who was rather heavily involved with some of the more questionable (yet fervently Catholic) chivalric orders from the late 1920s to the late 1940s - one in particular whose operations were disrupted by the war and never quite put back together as a good portion of its archival material found its way across the Atlantic in the post-war years.

TCP

The Ambassador was the author's son and the book you probably mean is "The Coming Race".

Very likely because he didn't, and the signature on the document didn't read "Gaylord" Freeman at all.

"We are obliged to send this present Mise en Garde against the ............. individual known as Jean-Luc-Chaumeil, born 20th October 1944, in Lille against whom an action for libel has been lodged in the High court at Nanterre 92000 by our G (three masonic dots) M (three masonic dots) Grand Master on 16th December 1983"

1969

John Drick, A. Robert Abboud, and Gaylord Freeman were three members of the Prieure de Sion that were associated with the First National Bank of Chicago. In 1969 Drick became both the president and one of the directors of the bank. He also was on the board of a number of other companies including, Stephan Chemical, MCA incorporated, Oak Industries, and Central Illinois Public Service. The Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance (the Guardian Assurance) in London where P.J. Freeman worked had shared a building with the First National Bank of Chicago which had Gaylord Freeman as chairman of the board of directors. In other words, the two businesses and the two Freeman’s all connected its seems to the Prieure de Sion, and then by other inferences all connected back to the hierarchy. Gaylord Freeman’s signature appeared on a Prieure de Sion document of Dec. 16, 1983. Gaylord Freeman never publicly admitted that he even knew anything about the P.d.S.

He makes for a marvelously intriguing smokescreen though. The actual gentleman in question couldn't hold a candle to him in terms of real accomplishment or influence. Except in the neo-chivalric netherworld, of course.

Freeman is a fairly common surname, it would be foolish to assume amalgamation. The one we're concerned with wasn't connected with the Chicago banker. He was the grandson of an authentic French prince who was rather heavily involved with some of the more questionable (yet fervently Catholic) chivalric orders from the late 1920s to the late 1940s - one in particular whose operations were disrupted by the war and never quite put back together as a good portion of its archival material found its way across the Atlantic in the post-war years.

Would we recognise him. And I notice the word synarchy in the link.

Vaincre No. 3, September 1989, page 22
Managing Editor: Thomas PLANTARD de SAINT-CLAIR
110, Rue Henri Dunant, 92700 COLOMBES

SOME ARCHIVES OF THE ‘PRIORY OF SION’ DISCOVERED IN BARCELONA…



The Grand Masters of the PRIORY OF SION:

(...)

1969…John DRICK

Source: Vaincre

If these gentlemen from the First National Bank of Chicago aren't guilty of p.d.s membership isn't it odd that Plantard should use them when you look at their known history?

I'd like to point out that these people were alive when Plantard et al were accusing them of being members of the P.D.S. This is libelous and they knew what Plantard was saying about them because the HBHG team had contacted them.

Since the article in the Daily Express a paper with a circulation of 3,000,000, nobody in Britain is unaware of the demand for the recognition of Merovingian rights made in 1955 and 1956 by Sir Alexander Aikman and Sir John Montague Brocklebank.

Would we recognise him.

And I notice the word synarchy in the link.

You're thinking about P F J Freeman aren't you?

Whether or not GAYLORD Freeman actually signed it or not is speculation on your part.

P F J Freeman? Tell me more?

If these gentlemen from the First National Bank of Chicago aren't guilty of p.d.s membership isn't it odd that Plantard should use them when you look at their known history?

I'd like to point out that these people were alive when Plantard et al were accusing them of being members of the P.D.S. This is libelous and they knew what Plantard was saying about them because the HBHG team had contacted them.

Can anyone show that 'Aikman' or 'Montague Brocklebank' wrote an article demanding 'recognition of Merovingian rights' in the Daily Express? And perhaps explain the relationship between Baron Beaverbrook and Alexander Aikman, and William Montagu and John Montague Brocklebank?

Yes. Not read either, unlikely to.

Not the greatest books I've ever read, but pretty innovative for their time. My favorite little tidbit about "The Coming Race" is the popularity at the time of the word "vril" which Bulwer-Lytton coined for the energy force/magic substance that drove the technologies of the subterraneans. Apparently Victorians would just drop it into conversations like we might toss in the word "grok" and it led to the naming of a product from Burton on Trent: Bovril which loosely translates to "cow elixir".

The name of Burton-on-Trent reappears ? Hmmmm.

Bovril......Pope Leo XIII from the armor and "lumen in coelo" above the RLC church door, with tower and Asmodeus/devil?.......




Uploaded with ImageShack.us

If these gentlemen from the First National Bank of Chicago aren't guilty of p.d.s membership isn't it odd that Plantard should use them when you look at their known history?





I'd like to point out that these people were alive when Plantard et al were accusing them of being members of the P.D.S. This is libelous and they knew what Plantard was saying about them because the HBHG team had contacted them.

Roscoe wrote:



What's odd about it Roscoe? Obviously Plantard, during his time in that library I was talking about the other day, read Viscount Leon de Poncins!!! Freemasonry and Judaism: The Secret Powers Behind Revolution is one of the books I was talking about in the same post. Clearly, Plantard utilised the claims made by Viscount Poncins and worked them into his narrative precisely to fool people like you, Roscoe.

Roscoe wrote:



What do you mean 'accusing' them? If Plantard had simply accused them of being members of the mythological Elders of Zion (which is, of course, what you, and others like you, are doing) while he himself stood OPENLY in the anti-Semitic traditionalist Catholic camp, he would have been just like so many other Anti-Semites. Have you been sued for libel yet, for the nonsenical gibberish that you continue to spout?

However, in Plantard's case he very cleverly made himself a part of the imaginary 'scary Jewish' cabal, so as to better peddle his anti-Semitic narrative. But it is an anti-Semitic narrative nevertheless and one that operates as a 'slow-burner', working particularly well on the minds of the credulous and paranoid, while often totally going 'under the radar' of those of a less hysterical mindset (which is, of course, an 'added bonus' considering its aims).

On first review, Plantard's Sion narrative seems to be saying that the Priory of Sion are the 'good guys', fighting against the 'evil' of the Catholic Church. This may have fooled those men mentioned above into believing they were being linked, by a harmless, delusional French crack-pot, to an imaginary but perhaps somehow laudable narrative. It did, after all, take a while for anti-Semites to see the extreme potential in the Priory of Sion narrative.

"In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish efforts rise the schemes of the International Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxemburg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide revolutionary conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster has ably shown, a definite recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworlds of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of the enormous empire.
There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creating of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. It is certainly the very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders... In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astounding. And the prominent if not the principal part in the system of terrorism applied by the extraordinary Commissions for combating Counter Revolution has been take by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many nonJews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing.

("Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People." ILLUSTRATED SUNDAY HERALD, London, February 8, 1920.)

The name of Burton-on-Trent reappears ? Hmmmm.

Bovril = cow elixir

Bovril......Pope Leo XIII from the armor and "lumen in coelo" above the RLC church door, with tower and Asmodeus/devil?.......

If you were to head down the path of looking at the Montagu-Douglas-Scotts, of the Dukes of Buccleuch, you might find some interesting tidbits.

I still can't believe after all these years no one has clued into the fact that the Mitford family surname was actually FREEMAN-MITFORD.

But "Gaylord" isn't a Mitford. Anxious to prove his filiation with that family, but not one of them.

TCP

For which they received polite denials. Do you think men of their stature would waste time pursuing a libel case against a non-entity like Plantard?

TCP