jb1717 wrote:
If this one was built in Cathar times then it obviously couldn't have been positioned as part of a geometry involving such later structures as Ch. de Blanchefort. Nor has it ever been shown that the Cathars positioned their structures geometrically. What's the perceived significance of this ruin?
I'm not sure that's there's any perceived significance; it's just mildly interesting.
My geometry reference was meant ironically, unless your implication is that no castle anywhere can be of any possible interest to anyone unless it can be shown to have some geometric subtext. Which I'm sure it isn't.
Incidentally, your contention that the possible geometric positioning of structures in the area necessarily post-dates the construction of Blanchefort, etc. greatly intrigues me, since I've always assumed we're talking about something far older, but that's a different subject for a different thread.
Back to La Vialasse and JV, what prompted my interest in the first place was Michel Lamy's interpretation of
Clovis Dardentor - the name of which has Merovingian connotations (King Clovis, and the "ardent shoot") - in which he references, via the name of a character, the mountain of Bugarach. The character is a sea captain, and so the boat shaped castle ruins of Vialasse, which point towards the mountain, and various other things in the story, are taken to form part of a series of clues about the mystery of RLC. My reading is that Bugarach is the significant site, rather than La Vialasse, given that the "boat" is pointing towards it. Hopefully, therefore, this hamlet will be left in peace. I'd feel awful if I inadvertently stimulated the wrong sort of interest. Lamy wrote his book in 1984, by the way, and I've only recently read an English translation, so this has all been out there for a while.
Will be out of the loop for a bit, so look forward to catching up with any further info in the future. Have enjoyed all the contributions so far.